IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 06 April 2018 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582E6127136 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 08:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nclct6OSVg9U for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 08:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BCF8127241 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 08:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id x16so941117pfm.4 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 08:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2KTYk20FcnV86UN/1CjVDluGjZXGOELmAHrtOymyYcs=; b=q9eN5xnsmA8EsgT0RvV8PXYTg/IFQZZiPRJu7xICXlB7zzeSMNTvCvlkFA/FrpK4Ji Fihv05weOBPiWB4FDQMp4CMmZ7gTIaCfaE7HiNbc1yP2nQSRDPGiWtYrifMQdBOUl3Tq 342jkA9luBvZ6m+R3utgLVDEwhNHN+YIEb/8QVM+OSO7FNr/aziaduFX8JyWiQZdOxyC M8XKZg4bPqaz0o9ZqsTbom7WWPeibfmxcfwaAOkELxPeKwTYp1jvcey8WgpGuHnV7q9E A17M1oUNQ3NW5y5vQ0fUNwFhTbAKRJRMITy70/Ygt34oC2SfAOJ8y/Eezmrh7N+1RQGv ZimQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2KTYk20FcnV86UN/1CjVDluGjZXGOELmAHrtOymyYcs=; b=Ou9ZOVlpPcqZ9t8EJoVGtFYoTvjq8RJjeTckYG+GdgRHOLNR+WzC+0emQD4M3BmikY d6JcjfVA7cGSOYX43GmW6Q+dl7nanvO/V+oaM1AQQFzZMH6EgUNmL9/O2TTu9WBSQppS fd6xwHaB8esu7NF1WZnAwFwsjYwc3ZiwaIeMvRSz7VNvimJ72QY9rwL475Gaud8zcCde CxyYi7ykcXpuBntA1OKgrcx0afrj5HDuGbeUOIdg4nfBZmVse3IOVPOt4YJDHCWiitNe JMo7e3OiiC0wzFuspg5/SPAPKFs6zpmmdbgz/3TCt9LxrejJbZjoYaWUSGHIanQC67oS ajvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GB+W2y3g4n0hhLQRHea+M83v5BcpAgbFG0b6mlgz5hSjZ3OfoU zOxZkMrCEE7Rsr3+SLb4/9A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48DTF5p62kcL3DVMeFo3QS2+5O1DG3zg8P7qD3pSA3EskW2qP3XuxqRA/HpQsBflEDuiaeO9g==
X-Received: by 10.167.131.147 with SMTP id u19mr20487016pfm.99.1523027224126; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 08:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2603:3024:151c:55f0:ccde:d8af:c871:fa59? ([2603:3024:151c:55f0:ccde:d8af:c871:fa59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm17769245pgs.79.2018.04.06.08.07.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Apr 2018 08:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <146E1710-D814-42F3-A9D7-FB5DBB2DED20@gigix.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 08:07:00 -0700
Cc: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BCAF7A0D-0ACB-4D7C-BF3B-5A6DD3F7111A@gmail.com>
References: <CA+YHcKFz=gJjSp-TXahA=65av6JX2G=EPJj=iV_XggKnqzV83g@mail.gmail.com> <C250775B-E482-4B03-9E13-1EF0E4D2B930@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKGp7m_ZD6er+Jc8kwO+eWHis10PPBG7N5dVzDj3N2pDmA@mail.gmail.com> <146E1710-D814-42F3-A9D7-FB5DBB2DED20@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/SV_3RN46MyrbD6t3Plm6WYjZpMo>
Subject: Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:07:09 -0000

Well it wasn’t a previous WG solution. It was an individual submission that one vendor implemented. Since the WG supports pubsub going forward, I think a forward pointer from the individual submission to the WG document is sufficient.

Dino

> On Apr 6, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub document? Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and that is kept in appendix as informational material.
> 
> any thoughts?
> 
> L.
> 
> 
>> On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to end and will update this document as appropriate.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alberto
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a working group document, maybe this document should point to draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>> > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft [1]. The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send SMRs and includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as the preferred PubSub mechanism.
>> >
>> > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Alberto
>> >
>> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lisp mailing list
>> > lisp@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email