IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Mon, 09 April 2018 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C9E12778D for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 03:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BhzRV56ncLWS for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 03:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x229.google.com (mail-wr0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FFF126D73 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 03:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x229.google.com with SMTP id s12so9042161wrc.8 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 03:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=nP1/c3LgIhCv0vY/V7OY85nMaGw3XHcxDua8IJkdw2U=; b=G4kSwIZ9Ybfw7SYvP2lBTeCEY4lVo/DZ44zR8B71GgcsQET5fNDXTaO4lMqVI/vTL2 oCH+hwrZ9MnVN/aYfwodkE+MVzrUYsIAk+OjZew21+G6Nch126XGhVJDCZBaGkyj4jsS KDwTlh3420l5AAlyScQGUYrQnTOrRKcgJyAmu96zFHJIL9kfjboUY138erCFFYCV2Hm5 2m5NINq8OjpUXFUqwqB2S5Bt+kgDdUSIoIDg5LgvZzably8etGjP/WmHOLbx6wSspfV+ ZmMAEa66URnIeQsd8/cg2j0ZCBHUlun4FlD4vZfMRteG6Np8I4D0zAzTX6ROACAA00ob XsEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=nP1/c3LgIhCv0vY/V7OY85nMaGw3XHcxDua8IJkdw2U=; b=iq4cnhAhkfLD/KhmhDxJzNoCF9Ssq8CHzVZiz+qrMcyiT3WF2pRsh+5WcSkICCw9W2 3+GhFVTNM+/sJ45Cy5zrU/7OY7BOFcziYYdPAly6h7P7uET2NKM3UsVwHBDjoYUkaqsu Wheutux9ofOQKDgPSykv69ZMpwF3dwFZqhm0GdsPMCZdZSAC8wPx89j32qXm3eFarqG/ /g1elpNA6+a0YcAakmXRNFko6L0tFbPQzTPdDw9rqU4qgw0dXsMKHP4XwPi6WPCVbZ60 08Rvy34bpEXaBEAZWjU9/ufmyrWo5UajDWY0tc8+2dJfUq8+05/Hxf8Ahk+dfodZOaOm IwZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7H1xk0J4c1VZlvB43aj1JpTqckacxcggm0GFpQUhUcUAhyWSnkn 1UOIaQscUEmwplAam9kuaiP9uA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49hmbZSMJ64rkaahcMV9ycLiXIK2tgGgujeXuR+fuU5ebnL08JwBl+FbLCtNCrU/MFEUOewFg==
X-Received: by 10.223.150.161 with SMTP id u30mr24730538wrb.151.1523269958372; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 03:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:e932:f9cf:dfce:214e? ([2001:660:330f:a4:e932:f9cf:dfce:214e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n29sm471659wmi.32.2018.04.09.03.32.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Apr 2018 03:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <04B545BB-3D64-4F66-99CC-BF77D2B785D5@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D051803A-B9DE-4E8B-959D-C4A5928C12F3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:32:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CA+YHcKH-EMh8juJ-WatE-RjLn7y2ojQnkZUSJ-6YfCHhYra41g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
References: <CA+YHcKFz=gJjSp-TXahA=65av6JX2G=EPJj=iV_XggKnqzV83g@mail.gmail.com> <C250775B-E482-4B03-9E13-1EF0E4D2B930@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKGp7m_ZD6er+Jc8kwO+eWHis10PPBG7N5dVzDj3N2pDmA@mail.gmail.com> <146E1710-D814-42F3-A9D7-FB5DBB2DED20@gigix.net> <CA+YHcKH-EMh8juJ-WatE-RjLn7y2ojQnkZUSJ-6YfCHhYra41g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/opA3fRxJqCC0usH_6j_y6UhAp9A>
Subject: Re: [lisp] MS-SMR draft
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 10:32:43 -0000

Alberto, Fabio, Dino,

thanks for the clarifications.

Ciao

L.

> On 6 Apr 2018, at 20:20, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That's a fair question Luigi. However, my personal opinion is that we should not put this into the PubSub document since PubSub is deprecating this. 
> 
> I believe the redirection should be from MS-SMR to PubSub. Once you are looking at PubSub there's no reason to look back at MS-SMR.
> 
> Alberto
> 
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub document? Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and that is kept in appendix as informational material.
> 
> any thoughts?
> 
> L.
> 
> 
>> On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com <mailto:rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to end and will update this document as appropriate.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alberto
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com <mailto:farinacci@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a working group document, maybe this document should point to draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00?
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>> > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com <mailto:rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft [1]. The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send SMRs and includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as the preferred PubSub mechanism.
>> >
>> > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Alberto
>> >
>> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lisp mailing list
>> > lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email