IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] RFCs 9300, 9301, 9301

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 15 April 2024 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68F6C14F6F3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JACMWjvhfZ_A for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CEAEC14F618 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a6ff4f91cbso1808794a91.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713189541; x=1713794341; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bls+24zBr5wu+R1el5Zxx1dszq3TnkNnSh3lko7eY40=; b=UtqJVCdE6neoQz/ZrPOjaKLajT3sbcN5clhlaHImL2oSbyCBXDyPEY1LLcs7v8qhnc t5qyaIwtliRlYCYFN8p+5yKL5CNhXUwKnoMgRBQG6XFBsGDTfpfyiQKnbBZY5XBw0t4u 25WK6x/tiZIbqkHBe2nwx39kk7Y8sp0w+s9eibrVckknfZs6CtYCDIOU0qlJHQllHl8P cZFH1yCJOmpd9GmydMxug0LGWcA7PGm/kgZAiMiyTo1RgnSpWaYXLK7hWz83vCe9t5pE mQ1XP6sAS87YESwqx9n8M6zrlXIgFALQhTA8jUY/HmGtaOobCJ5DuNWLL4xqc03uJLbo 01pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713189541; x=1713794341; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bls+24zBr5wu+R1el5Zxx1dszq3TnkNnSh3lko7eY40=; b=J2Hl3gvCAgOxVQobjFXqtmKX3wkoFWWp8vGEna8I7LrL5wKAXF0dCm3/kGlJEROg8/ PQK8D84Jnj6j8gUBlwOkIM9490LugQtCA8EFzXQNqAQ1YG0WwhUwjtbHa3m3YYIVTtOI wrWT1ck5D+uFq2tG+dbQrUJ9YsSd053cOqMMoWS2LiSgauD/cR0XGbTBRlEa6KvSuGgk BjFGD4TbeQ5mR2W47ZPkGFsyyXkMJq9nbN6IGpCpZG+P/H4/nmLp6yqR+rQrIiRYyCGA j+6CfCWh/WXxTmQfJph0gyngmESg2JYVSHYUXrO5s4LqW2Occ9402F7b8t0W195Fa1hk q3Ew==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVUj9qjKMNbqZ4h/JwFrh5Di8X2vHaDicvKVeUtjvo+4GSLq6AZeBGcbIDUtMNWbxqOX8FSRHs0Isf6QX7R
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzoQ17DWKvMoBfKmgPRfcgTDCQ6IANWhWeq+JnFctRUU9UK8l0k v9LireKVkwuFv/lox2KWc7TgujsAVQFGH6ZJ16G4axGiopOXYtcbsRQZ7m4n75MEBjy3t/bWTqE s7k72O4OLM5PXEl2V+WtVwoOlhd0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEioZU3yqiGKHijVqmxMRFZP/+Qsdk/u5PgHgbA/vRdjLPtOAMRqgThCGPWdYDOn/c+Rx1MaJWlUbhCGuHWKjU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:989:b0:2a7:a36c:140b with SMTP id 9-20020a17090a098900b002a7a36c140bmr4236404pjo.36.1713189541425; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:59:00 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR11MB6914482AAC7335AD68689D87C6072@CY8PR11MB6914.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CY8PR11MB6914482AAC7335AD68689D87C6072@CY8PR11MB6914.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:59:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxTn8yxxFswQ8RGcVL4yQWrHJTFwHFOHGwf1uMCGPd0Bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dave Fusik (dfusik)" <dfusik=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000cba840616230610"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/WyEkLK38JyzRmyL7-2GFOZZFD-8>
Subject: Re: [lisp] RFCs 9300, 9301, 9301
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:59:06 -0000

Hi Dave!

It is not a matter of when, but if.  Note that not all widely-deployed
protocols are Internet Standards — BGP is a good example.

The WG may decide to take on the task to change the status, which usually
requires a revised RFC.  Take a look at rfc6410 [1] for the
requirements/process.

HTH,

Alvaro.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6410#autoid-4

On April 15, 2024 at 8:00:13 AM, Dave Fusik (dfusik) (
dfusik=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org) wrote:

To whom it may concern,
Sorry to bother you. I see that the above RFCs have a status of "Proposed
Standard" and I'm wondering if you can provide any insight on when these
will progress to "Internet Standard". Thanks for any information you can
provide.

*Best regards,*

*Dave Fusik*

____________________________________________________

Solutions Engineer | CISCO – U.S. Federal Defense Sales

CCDE #2013::70 | CCIE #4768: Enterprise Infrastructure and Security

Office: 919-392-3701 | Cell: 919-637-1058 | dfusik@cisco.com
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email