IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] RFCs 9300, 9301, 9301

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Tue, 16 April 2024 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8E6C14F5F2 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0dY1sTjBv-B for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0712FC14F6E4 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-570097653faso2789839a12.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1713266313; x=1713871113; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pUgPqQicTmIRpvzc6/ZXo/8Y+XxWOIHwaLDWugEVzpY=; b=arzfbD2/pUHASs9ME4+gaLB1MYIZOmbzYb1tfqCTmkkQdUAJiOgZNICVyHKNxNegZz k66YVr40ReKQVMZOSqp9m9l8kr97s+tznypBocqlIakfe9WxHjB8/JaNmFuX2nLFnDTJ 0+tO0Tcpd7NiRkMUfn/zd3MUmywoCzh20j2SCZyRlBtlYZ2XRxQUApDXt91TFy34wmfJ 1IQZ37zBpVB+q05gt6navLDx7UXO9BVbm1ZzA7MfMORxt5rNLFZnxhXN/BMGU/HBpD1m XhfwCWVzisJ15wXSQYYsihNdchyeLda7DDpx+1+pGLmnHndb9et5YyS8Jp1aDjr//X4x c6Gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713266313; x=1713871113; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pUgPqQicTmIRpvzc6/ZXo/8Y+XxWOIHwaLDWugEVzpY=; b=GoptYbb9JwquC03d/TnjtcDK333Cd67OA4u6Hm/KbXMxqJ8uPn03LoRqd/DiA2yt8P slwEBp4ZW+2Uajop4dg4v/MYMwgFCJs8rGdi/7jlJA73p/Ko+YydaYLU5uFDZWTwT3xN DCaxeJ7gsy8dggtlQi7AQTcy9NBErRKbEQEGZKUtUhC+t0LlMkvf8fYAaXk82f9kupxn CQTp8lyq1nTWXCoL/iSMpG8TJGh3xNSL4vWksYoy6fq8wbwYRgjCMjmfPKi6hFObDzQU cOWuVSd1OFjigwxGQnMs/kgwSgW2PAIoD/D3L8Mz1SiAoZY+u5JGxg0GS7V3kBTTZbRR EB/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzWw5gGLGsWoibMRdwcMUx1cYqPYnkQ1P3gSa4vkb3z70DINx9A ax7b3AS0+ZRWw8B9r/UkeZTkT7NygDq4HmQhcp/2iijc39VuBBTlrrP2DKxt/7P2+Sc18ePJehH nRWA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFdUdbM9VatmJbGLbVvJlMbyqyepc+WVGhYHvMMT0JclzQGHdirlqru/+VY/7x5b42YeeUy5w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:752:b0:a52:3adc:b779 with SMTP id z18-20020a170906075200b00a523adcb779mr10226432ejb.17.1713266312731; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([119.13.72.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p4-20020a17090635c400b00a4a33cfe593sm6700673ejb.39.2024.04.16.04.18.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <7FDB54DD-65C8-447D-BE3D-EF1CF0420BCC@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FDB38214-47EC-42E2-A8F8-142453A862DA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:16:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR11MB6914482AAC7335AD68689D87C6072@CY8PR11MB6914.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
To: "Dave Fusik (dfusik)" <dfusik=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CY8PR11MB6914482AAC7335AD68689D87C6072@CY8PR11MB6914.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/lnBJuzeY3rxpniPxGZIOgYkXGFA>
Subject: Re: [lisp] RFCs 9300, 9301, 9301
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:18:50 -0000

Hi Dave,

RFC that are standard track have different maturity level. 
The requirements and procedure to become Internet Standard are described in RFC 6410 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6410/)

Ciao

L.

> On 9 Apr 2024, at 02:31, Dave Fusik (dfusik) <dfusik=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> To whom it may concern,
> Sorry to bother you. I see that the above RFCs have a status of "Proposed Standard" and I'm wondering if you can provide any insight on when these will progress to "Internet Standard". Thanks for any information you can provide.
> 
> Best regards,
> Dave Fusik
> ____________________________________________________
> Solutions Engineer | CISCO – U.S. Federal Defense Sales
> CCDE #2013::70 | CCIE #4768: Enterprise Infrastructure and Security
> Office: 919-392-3701 | Cell: 919-637-1058 | dfusik@cisco.com <mailto:dfusik@cisco.com>_______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email