[lisp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-04-09: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 05 January 2024 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB5CC14F6FB; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 09:54:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.2.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <170447724723.3799.7498674721103622310@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 09:54:07 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/bcUFkYR6O3IevmZRbeHVRNedSaw>
Subject: [lisp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-04-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 17:54:07 -0000

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-lisp-04-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing my BLOCK. It's good to understand that they are going to
develop a new NAT traversal technique rather than appropriate an existing one.