[lisp] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

["Alvaro Retana" <[e-mail]>]

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-12: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This document is clearly requesting the assignment of LISP EID space for
an experiment.  Why is it not an Experimental document?  [I may have
missed the discussion in the archive.]

Along the same lines, the conditions for the experiment to be successful
and the IETF to consider whether to transform the prefix into a permanent
assignment (Section 6.  3+3 Allocation Plan) are not defined.  How should
this decision be made?  How will the IETF know the experiment is
successful?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

An early allocation was made in October/2015.  The values should be
included in the document.

The dates mentioned assumed a start date of December/2015, but the
document isn't getting approved until now — is there a need to change the
dates?  Just wondering — part of it is that I'm not sure if RIPE has
already started allocating addresses or not.

Please expand ROA and put in a reference.