Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction - Design Principles and Use Cases

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Mon, 13 October 2014 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE011A8904 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZ5_bTIjy1eT for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0CC1A6F2B for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so6786508wiv.11 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=6QKrTrK+578AwG7/IB6XZuMVZUTFy2KUJoMs+tsk5vc=; b=UnAYTBZ2KOenuk3KYUWEtvlMrKtQzYwhCmgmisSVFA0l1GQmzxdMvh07KqkbnUqDoV 6QtBYbwoju31JK/2+/uXGRa6l1wclDYwP+itaqAeISRS2UVlznpobPtEfCMzOQ9VzCqB /anMttPC44bUIrnAYBWvHfnTUvbJnDDp5FfHn479GqziV5goK5Tgx4gN3UCoGbWLS9Nq pShDwtqe5vNscBoCNFRU1dZI1M2R416w0E5mT/B8FgqicO+zpBVv/OxhW/ZLUcO5buPl Z7Yl6wBTXUPoUihBIWsDQhZDQecbkKGVWG6mqyk9DoqY/Dk8KitluPjg+XXkRYvfL8Ca NqJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9Aiqb9pzKY8C8f9+Vh68O6H4gFDZ4ZGp5neT2GZpFEonqw5jVNn8FRPMdjibxAOFSofte
X-Received: by 10.180.188.102 with SMTP id fz6mr18719509wic.61.1413191817825; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp164-84.enst.fr (dhcp164-84.enst.fr. [137.194.165.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm15926618wja.25.2014.10.13.02.16.53 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <20139005-A5CE-4E48-A5AD-04B395DA934E@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:16:56 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <241960CF-6E66-4F1B-B7FC-33096A718EE7@gigix.net>
References: <a9e800cf8a2c468ab72524d182aaad64@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BE54EC54-FCEA-4333-B5BD-1861AA0537EC@gmail.com> <5ad34cf8c2bb4e87a471cf80e9dcc3f3@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20139005-A5CE-4E48-A5AD-04B395DA934E@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/sygFBfGi_i_FVfhiOcnUwUb4QGc
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction - Design Principles and Use Cases
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:17:00 -0000

Hi,

I wonder how much is important to clarify whether or not a principle is unique to LISP.

I  tend to agree with Albert’s viewpoint, the document should give the list of principles LISP is based on so to provide the reader the big picture of LISP in a nutshell.

The only remaining question is whether or not we want to add a bullet concerning the push/pull model & Mapping database.

ciao

Luigi



On 12 Oct 2014, at 03:32, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well everything tends to look the same but not in this case. This is the first mapping database that is really fully specified and tested at the network layer. 
> 
> Dino
> 
> 
>> On Oct 11, 2014, at 9:20 PM, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Dino,
>> 
>> That too!
>> 
>> However, the mapping database system is not entirely unique to LISP. Every architecture that maps one address space to another needs a data base to maintain mapping information. The part that is unique to LISP is how the data is distributed
>> 
>>                                                                    Ron
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farinacci@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 9:02 PM
>>> To: Ronald Bonica
>>> Cc: lisp@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-introduction - Design Principles and Use
>>> Cases
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 11, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> In Section 2.1, we say that LISP is built on top of four basic design principles:
>>>> 
>>>> - Locator/Identifier split
>>>> - Overlay architecture
>>>> - Decoupled data and control-plane
>>>> - Incremental deployability
>>> 
>>> You left out one that is really important:
>>> 
>>> - A Mapping Database System
>>> 
>>> Dino
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp