IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-12.txt

"Bugenhagen, Michael K" <Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D1C129541 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:30:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBdGKTsQJEIT for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lxomp52w.centurylink.com (lxomp52w.centurylink.com [155.70.50.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2161294A7 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lxomavmpc030.qintra.com (lxomavmpc030.qintra.com [151.117.207.30]) by lxomp52w.centurylink.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id uAGIUXIm058579 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:30:34 -0600
Received: from lxomavmpc030.qintra.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C791E0032; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:30:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (unknown [151.117.18.14]) by lxomavmpc030.qintra.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80F01E0059; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:30:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id uAGIUSlX047009; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:30:28 -0600
Received: from vodcwhubex501.ctl.intranet (vodcwhubex501.ctl.intranet [151.117.206.27]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id uAGIUS7A047006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:30:28 -0600
Received: from PODCWMBXEX505.ctl.intranet ([fe80::f87e:fe44:ad72:b610]) by vodcwhubex501.ctl.intranet ([151.117.206.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:30:28 -0600
From: "Bugenhagen, Michael K" <Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [lmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-12.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSM8bRsvjT24vr006+fLPOTN+8+KDbYe+AgABsvwCAAAnHAIAAZL+A//+fS4CAAGnfgP//n/mAgAB6qQD//6ZzgA==
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:30:28 +0000
Message-ID: <ABF8CB49-ECAE-474E-AE04-E5BA4911182A@centurylink.com>
References: <147795313794.23217.15358328180744934565.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF6469E5@njmtexg5.research.att.com> <76980d09da0a4bc2a0dcfd987be82e94@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <20161116094216.GB51980@elstar.local> <217244c70df845bd82d4fa159f53ad50@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <7FFD36A0-01E6-43C4-B3DB-094421BCCEB1@centurylink.com> <20161116161539.GB52611@elstar.local> <08EF6DD9-C3E9-4390-996D-3C0620CF3A92@centurylink.com> <20161116175058.GC52870@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20161116175058.GC52870@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1c.0.161115
x-originating-ip: [155.70.16.191]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C68C905617FBD24FB566F4B577FB1F87@centurylink.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/YugKdIXUw4K2PPSvofdu8U0qjt8>
Cc: "philip.eardley@bt.com" <philip.eardley@bt.com>, "acmorton@att.com" <acmorton@att.com>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-12.txt
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:30:41 -0000

I agree.

     My thought here was that a test server is a MA….  To some extent.

So, the TWAMP method might apply globally – but I haven’t been able to keep up with the LMAP work so I thought I owed the group the input on “hey we’ve seen this in real testing” type inputs.

That way the group has a chance to react if something needs to be fixed…
Not sure if there is anything to fix, but at least I communicated it.

Wish I was at the meeting with you guys!!

Best regards,
Mike





On 11/16/16, 11:50 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

    I searched for 'limit' and 'load' and 'rate' in RFC 7594 and there is
    some discussion but mostly limited to possible load issues on the
    collector, load issues on the path, and that suppression may be used
    to handle overload situations.

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email