Re: [lmap] [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> (Time Capability in NETCONF) to Experimental RFC

Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> Mon, 29 June 2015 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F05B1B2BDE; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7agxBpAPlok; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF03B1B2BDC; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3532; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1435598245; x=1436807845; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a2cjrFbYHuNvpuOB56CryJlGxrpc1cX358/ZzwvlcDc=; b=XgK1Z8fmCZs4dc/YuoO37w3tAu2xoMDfEDZG4hxGkoebDkiVusvbJM79 Y2sWIVzB2/AJjJmPpU+fXPdgaXx4hb3lcDIAPyUVWW0Z5g4pklissTwOc wfWY1JXf7t31IkICjYufVcx/0BfJP8X2bydsWjmhm/IjOnp51omdiGqZn U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CoAwAtfZFV/4sNJK1bgxFUX70kCYFcCoUuSgKBOzgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCIBAQEDAQEBATU2CgEMBAsRAQMBAQEJFgQEBwkDAgECARUfAwYIBgEMAQUCAQGIIwgNyHsBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBItKhFMzBwaEJQEElASEWYJYhCSBOoQRgmuQBSZjgSkcFYFZIjGCSAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,371,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="163670655"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2015 17:17:07 +0000
Received: from [10.150.53.127] (dhcp-10-150-53-127.cisco.com [10.150.53.127]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5THH6gh031642; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:17:06 GMT
Message-ID: <55917D92.5050604@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:17:06 -0400
From: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20150629145822.7722.8876.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5CA78C61@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5CA78C61@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/bBKehJ99h5bP0wcJ3ibJerzO0nw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:34:15 -0700
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> (Time Capability in NETCONF) to Experimental RFC
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:17:31 -0000

On 6/29/15 12:49, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> (I apologize for cross-posting) but it seems justified in this case)
>
> I find this work useful.

As do I.  I remember the when this was first presented in Berlin.  I 
thought it had value.

>
> I have two questions:
> - why was not this document adopted by the NETCONF WG? Lack of time, out of focus, or are there any other (technical?) reasons? Why did it had to go on AD-sponsored and Experimental track?

I'll speak from what I saw.  There didn't seem to be a lot of traction 
on the WG list, but I do feel this would be beneficial as a working 
group item.

Joe

> - This work may potentially be useful for LMAP which has scheduling and time-stamping features in its architecture and framework. LMAP however just selected RESTCONF as their preferred protocol. What would it take to extend this work to RESTCONF)? (may be another piece of work)
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> The IESG
>> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 5:58 PM
>> To: IETF-Announce
>> Subject: Last Call: <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> (Time
>> Capability in NETCONF) to Experimental RFC
>>
>>
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
>> following document:
>> - 'Time Capability in NETCONF'
>>    <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> as Experimental RFC
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
>> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-07-29. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
>> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>>
>>     This document defines a capability-based extension to the Network
>>     Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) that allows time-triggered
>>     configuration and management operations. This extension allows
>>     NETCONF clients to invoke configuration updates according to
>>     scheduled times, and allows NETCONF servers to attach timestamps to
>>     the data they send to NETCONF clients.
>>
>>
>> The Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Capability URNs registry
>> requires a standards action in order to populate the registry. This document
>> was taken out of the ISE stream and brought forward as an AD sponsored
>> individual-submission to address this consideration.
>>
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dmm-2Dnetconf-2Dtime-
>> 2Dcapability_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNX
>> CJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=eIbq6OXE65r_w9lwmd5WrktViMncM
>> zhCDjk3tyjnVvU&s=B6e1FBSZH9H-
>> OYAnRMYEgTJVYQ6SSqa2K9XpuIyx3mI&e=
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dmm-2Dnetconf-2Dtime-
>> 2Dcapability_ballot_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR3
>> 1OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=eIbq6OXE65r_w9lwmd5WrktVi
>> MncMzhCDjk3tyjnVvU&s=WbISmWkVGVo43riTMHY7kzIkAREkQrB2aq-
>> lyYOad-Y&e=
>>
>>
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>