IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lmap] LMAP Framework - ready for submission to the IESG?

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 10 September 2014 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAA01A00E7 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1oLG1q0zaydB for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F72A1A7022 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlgLABRTEFTGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABZgkcjI1NXBLEjmRKHTAGBDxZ4hAMBAQEBAxIbXAIBCA0EBAEBCx0HMhQJCAEBBBMIARmIIAEMnh+fcwEXhXyGIgGCXQEBHjcBgy+BHQWRQYZsjDCEOYkLg2FsAYEOOYEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,499,1406606400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="84189904"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2014 09:33:45 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.14]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 10 Sep 2014 09:33:39 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.14]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:33:37 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lmap] LMAP Framework - ready for submission to the IESG?
Thread-Index: Ac/B44MV/q3ebtFuToqdna6pxGH8yQLGBFow
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:33:36 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C89741F@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C87DBF2@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C87DBF2@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C89741FAZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/ynhuhVtw-gckQSFC_cJx0mrfeME
Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP Framework - ready for submission to the IESG?
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:34:18 -0000

Hi,

No concern or other comments were expressed.

The chairs will prepare the write-up and submit the document to the IESG.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


From: lmap [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:42 PM
To: lmap@ietf.org
Subject: [lmap] LMAP Framework - ready for submission to the IESG?

Hi,

A revised I-D for the LMAP framework was submitted and is available at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lmap-framework-08.txt.

We already ran two WGLCs for this I-D, and we deferred the decision about the need of a third one after IETF-90, in order to allow for an examination of the list of changes. Phil described the changes in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/current/msg01742.html. Jason and me believe that a full WGLC is not needed, but we would like to allow for one more week for folks who have sent comments to check and confirm that they were addressed, and for everybody else to have another look and share any concerns left.

So, please, have another read of this document and let us know if you believe that there are good reasons NOT to forward this document to the IESG for considerations and Informational RFC. Please send these before Wednesday, September 3, 2014, COB.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email