[lmap] LMAP Framework - ready for submission to the IESG?

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 27 August 2014 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BE21A05C0 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrHkDIsEa83k for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5996A1A058E for <lmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmILALa0/VPGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABbgkcjIyAzVwSvCQiceCEBCYdMAYEPFneEBQEBAxIbXgEMCRVWJgEEGwEZiCABDJs/hGWfBBeFfIYhAYJdAQEegnAPRCSBHQWRL4ZnjB+ENYkFg15sAYEOOYEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,409,1406606400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="79977094"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2014 06:41:54 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 27 Aug 2014 06:41:53 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 06:41:52 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: LMAP Framework - ready for submission to the IESG?
Thread-Index: Ac/B44MV/q3ebtFuToqdna6pxGH8yQ==
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:41:52 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C87DBF2@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C87DBF2AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/zMXT9Cgdkf1g17VenrS0HrjLVxg
Subject: [lmap] LMAP Framework - ready for submission to the IESG?
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:41:57 -0000

Hi,

A revised I-D for the LMAP framework was submitted and is available at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lmap-framework-08.txt.

We already ran two WGLCs for this I-D, and we deferred the decision about the need of a third one after IETF-90, in order to allow for an examination of the list of changes. Phil described the changes in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/current/msg01742.html. Jason and me believe that a full WGLC is not needed, but we would like to allow for one more week for folks who have sent comments to check and confirm that they were addressed, and for everybody else to have another look and share any concerns left.

So, please, have another read of this document and let us know if you believe that there are good reasons NOT to forward this document to the IESG for considerations and Informational RFC. Please send these before Wednesday, September 3, 2014, COB.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan