Re: [LOOPS] Results of the LOOPS side meeting May 2020

Hi Med,

thank you for these proposals.  I had a bit of a hard time integrating some of them, because they don’t come with a rationale — sometimes the change seems to be a bit out of character with the charter.

Please have a look at https://github.com/loops-wg/charter/commit/6336fc92ea28733e61ca920d9822cb74add17ec2 and tell me if you think any of the other changes are essential.

Grüße, Carsten

> On 2020-06-04, at 12:01, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten, 
> 
> Thank you for reflecting the outcome of the discussion in the proposed charter text.
> 
> FWIW, you may find some change proposals at: https://github.com/loops-wg/charter/pull/3/files 
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : LOOPS [mailto:loops-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Carsten
>> Bormann
>> Envoyé : jeudi 4 juin 2020 02:16
>> À : loops@ietf.org
>> Objet : [LOOPS] Results of the LOOPS side meeting May 2020
>> 
>> Thank you all for participating in the May 26 side meeting.
>> I have updated the charter proposal with the results of the
>> discussion:
>> 
>> https://github.com/loops-wg/charter
>> 
>> This reflects embracing ECN both for the end-to-end flows and for the
>> path segment, as well as cleaning up the milestones to a single
>> deliverable (which might or might not be multiple documents; I don’t
>> think the charter needs to nail this down).  Goals for FEC support are
>> scaled down, but FEC stays in as part of the first deliverable.
>> 
>> I have also moved the “discussion” section to a separate file.
>> 
>> Please have a timely look as the charter will be one of the inputs to
>> the BOF process — we need to have a solid BOF proposal by June 12.
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>> --
>> LOOPS mailing list
>> LOOPS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops