[lp-wan] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-13: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 November 2020 03:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F343A1692; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 19:51:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan@ietf.org, lpwan-chairs@ietf.org, lp-wan@ietf.org, Dominique Barthel <dominique.barthel@orange.com>, dominique.barthel@orange.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <160454829825.3662.12184527073497354505@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:51:38 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/6SNahPoYvTXg0S4Gdj9w6Sx60vg>
Subject: [lp-wan] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 03:51:39 -0000
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The title, Abstract, and Introduction all use “LoRaWAN” without expansion or explanation. I suggest expanding it as “Long Range WAN” in all three places, and citing [lora-alliance-spec] at that expansion in the Introduction (you dont cite it until Section 4). Please expand LPWAN on first use in the Introduction. And a comment about Martin’s comment: “I found this document to be very tough going without reading through RFC8724.” ... Well, to be fair, 8724 is a normative reference, so isn’t that sort of expected?
- [lp-wan] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: [lp-wan] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Olivier Gimenez
- Re: [lp-wan] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Barry Leiba