Re: [lp-wan] [IoT-DIR] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-lpwan-overview-08

Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1512126B72; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:12:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RZh-ygc0WNdd; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:12:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com (mail-ua0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3D7120454; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f5so743425ual.8; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:12:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BUL1QGQU7Burzb4g6fR3aro2aPFPhzRzdG/ytEQwjVI=; b=JLpIoJZBNHIUlsvCnMkuJk2G7pYH2bE+Oy/o6Cz5Ekxg6baDNQ5vDqQpMnImFreAj5 egsLaq6f/RYM3b67J/Xwt/IYC6aSQ1rpG31lLBdEfl6EnIRa7DxCZxBVvrfhe2kx8avE fSfeybjWR2HgCL0a42UNh4YN//73zaKMPcJkS5iLmXEL7BoOScrmLSyYPSMMDvSnQobz ujvFi2ZWj7kkBcd5rOv9pV97rjqrF9zkgb1aWqnasRvr+avIUEtAYTLBDw+o5qgDY/uB bDCLUiHTGD/C0mRmRUYDbXNQuL2V2i2B0P/LtQKMMz1FKQcsnC0jVf8g+x67MC1yU3hd Aeag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BUL1QGQU7Burzb4g6fR3aro2aPFPhzRzdG/ytEQwjVI=; b=oQwbAfzMNrLPxpfDlFcmHCam5h75Dh/aVrhrvs11lPR3glunkdD2VRTGsikX8zDcqi Tx1Y9sOaJNMIDCM2xm4d5Deje1+DhaAXR9/5n/ICCb55L26suFd5H7fpTfKO53OCicCq 4bH0EBvNckaAKQUCMBijcF2Qdl0zxRRk9AYJOJFP0NECqS2ckgd+qDDhgaNCDG6E2bhb TYC1J/PIndruPpr11aSZLwrgIY2IRHdkt4BXyFFJObuxoOvCQItiJIQu5GNdDk+gtezn U2h155ybPD1OlvDm1ZVJJ4O9VK7IEQ5238x5Icpwd90Nz8uqWqR7QQqau7XPnkLHJjpV wguQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDdD1KalbVVganeW5992H6UWKgLUswYkTq9etseAB+584PFL03s FNclQHIj9V26CPdnFLLdA40BAO48ROMqGi6lTCM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225R1ysK9RMJQKwovcL16vZUujXsYT81u0lds6sL4kYMlQzgTLoPB1dXzNEcXm6L2D8IoM8mRixM+Gqc8V5DPbM=
X-Received: by 10.176.81.78 with SMTP id f14mr5434808uaa.135.1518016354715; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:12:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.58.7 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:12:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.58.7 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:12:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4335918E-02D5-4C01-87B0-46B1E04E33EB@kaloom.com>
References: <151789372733.25044.6564639581693985529@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKmdBpcci6VcYzki3eY+2_KAWk8uK5pnHw7tPYWW5fbL=47xKw@mail.gmail.com> <9eb6d6a5-239e-b8e7-f93d-2a6cc8fe7491@cs.tcd.ie> <4335918E-02D5-4C01-87B0-46B1E04E33EB@kaloom.com>
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:12:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKmdBpcxYxFLGoUyr03ctmF6OtHh3NWEKPd+xi5vT4cmdEeLJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, iot-dir <Iot-dir@ietf.org>, "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lpwan-overview.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lpwan-overview.all@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c19193e960c540564a0b9ea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/FXCsfy9qlbN0PcEGWnqGQ6DvhDE>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] [IoT-DIR] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-lpwan-overview-08
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:12:38 -0000

Hi Suresh, Stephen and all:
My apologies for being late on the reviews from IoT directorate. I was not
aware about its progress already.

I would suggest changing some of the typos and inconsistencies that Stephen
probably has already taken care of.

Also I will provide him a few lines of text on the 6lowpan section which is
minimal change.

The editorial changes would have been easier for reading the document but I
understand the current situation. I am okay with Stephen's response at this
point and Suresh, I am fine with your decision.
Thanks,
-Samita


On Feb 6, 2018 12:24 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" <Suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:

Hi Stephen/Samita,

(Removed the IETF Discussion list)

On Feb 6, 2018, at 10:10 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:


Hi Samita,

Thanks for the review. As this document has at this stage been
through IESG evaluation, I think it's best to avoid changes if
possible, but I'll be guided by the responsible AD, (i.e. if
Suresh tells me he thinks some change is needed, I'll do it.)
For such cases below I just say I think it's a bit late for
the change suggested.


Yep. I think this review was due 2017/12/01 and the draft has already gone
through IESG evaluation. At this point I would not like to make changes
unless they are errors or obvious typos. Depending on the type and amount
of changes made, I can recycle the document through the IESG if needed.
Stephen’s accepted changes look fine to me and if they are fine with you
Samita you can submit a new revision.

Alex/Pascal,
  Any thoughts on this?

Regards
Suresh