Re: [lp-wan] [IoT-DIR] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-lpwan-overview-08

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 07/02/18 10:28, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Thanks Steve!
> 
> In preparation of rev 10, I see that we can already add Charlie
> -pending Suresh's confirmation- and remove appendix A, what do you
> think?

I just pushed out -10 which adds Charlie as requested (and
apologies for forgetting to do that before). I've left
appendix A in (who knows we might end up with a -11:-) and
the RFC editor will remove it anyway (to be sure, I added
a note asking 'em to).

If anyone named in acks or as a contributor or whatever wants
the RFC editor to fix non-ASCII characters in your name,
please just send me a mail and I'll check that gets done at
auth-48.

Cheers,
S.

> 
> Pascal
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Farrell
> [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: mardi 6 février 2018 21:52 
> To: Alexander Pelov <[e-mail]>; Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> <[e-mail]> Cc: Suresh Krishnan
> <[e-mail]>; iot-dir <[e-mail]>; Samita
> Chakrabarti <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Suresh
> Krishnan <[e-mail]> Subject: Re: [lp-wan] [IoT-DIR] Iotdir
> early review of draft-ietf-lpwan-overview-08
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Grand so - based on Suresh's and the chairs' mails, I've submitted
> -09. If there are editorial tweaks we can do those during auth-48 I
> guess. If something substantive comes up, I guess we'd discuss that
> here on the WG list.
> 
> So I think this one's ready to shoot off the RFC editor.
> 
> Cheers, S.
> 
> On 06/02/18 20:37, Alexander Pelov wrote:
>> Hi Suresh, Pascal, all,
>> 
>> First, I’d like to thank Samita for the review, which once more
>> reinsures that the document is at an excellent level and with
>> excellent quality. Thanks, Samita, for catching some final minor
>> details, and thanks to Stephen for fixing them right away.
>> 
>> Then again, nothing is perfect, and there always will be place for
>> improvement. My impression is that at this stage the document
>> fulfills its goal, so getting it back to make it more perfect would
>> seem like counter-productive. I like the idea of having a glossary
>> document published.. but then again, I don’t think a glossary will
>> actually suffice to describe what RRC does, or the different
>> aspects of 3GPP technology (or any other for that matter). Maybe
>> this will be the start for a new book on LPWANs?
>> 
>> So, back to the point, I agree with Suresh that at this stage,
>> unless there are obvious typos or errors, we should continue with
>> the process.
>> 
>> Best, Alexander
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 6 févr. 2018 à 18:39, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
>>> <[e-mail]> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Same here, Suresh.
>>> 
>>> Samita ‘s recommendations all make sense but arrive too late in
>>> the process.
>>> 
>>> Maybe We could ask the group or the IOT dir to work out a
>>> glossary and add it as reference at publish time?
>>> 
>>> Pascal
>>> 
>>> Le 6 févr. 2018 à 18:24, Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]
>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Hi Stephen/Samita,
>>>> 
>>>> (Removed the IETF Discussion list)
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 10:10 AM, Stephen Farrell
>>>>> <[e-mail]
>>>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Samita,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the review. As this document has at this stage
>>>>> been through IESG evaluation, I think it's best to avoid
>>>>> changes if possible, but I'll be guided by the responsible
>>>>> AD, (i.e. if Suresh tells me he thinks some change is needed,
>>>>> I'll do it.) For such cases below I just say I think it's a
>>>>> bit late for the change suggested.
>>>> 
>>>> Yep. I think this review was due 2017/12/01 and the draft has
>>>> already gone through IESG evaluation. At this point I would not
>>>> like to make changes unless they are errors or obvious typos.
>>>> Depending on the type and amount of changes made, I can recycle
>>>> the document through the IESG if needed. Stephen’s accepted
>>>> changes look fine to me and if they are fine with you Samita
>>>> you can submit a new revision.
>>>> 
>>>> Alex/Pascal, Any thoughts on this?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards Suresh
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ lp-wan mailing
>>> list [e-mail] 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ lp-wan mailing
>> list [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>> 
> 
> -- PGP key change time for me. New-ID 7B172BEA; old-ID 805F8DA2
> expires Jan 24 2018. NewWithOld sigs in keyservers. Sorry if that
> mucks something up;-) 
> _______________________________________________ lp-wan mailing list 
> [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
> 

-- 
PGP key change time for me.
New-ID 7B172BEA; old-ID 805F8DA2 expires Jan 24 2018.
NewWithOld sigs in keyservers.
Sorry if that mucks something up;-)