Re: [lp-wan] Question on draft-thubert-lpwan-command-reg-00.txt
Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Tue, 31 March 2020 11:36 UTC
Return-Path: <ana@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EB03A18AE for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTeT2P2C9gZ6 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3393A18AD for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id r25so9482439ioc.11 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UQO0DLY5EGPuPlH1sEyHQcELoaN87Wae9x/UTTTvL3Y=; b=OgKoOtOXioRGLY1uPVNPkM0OkT6oWQHxCAQ15ZUeqJcJ/I1g1zGHFdBdjaExPDwtMm L9sAIzjp/ILF1WQVDJ8c91NQVovkkcLfa3MXzhEHg8RcD/Hzpl+kzWKDJVPaD9cA6qkH 7H3uOvEAufp9aKIMbUxYWthaTe+NoMrp0ZXUE2LsqHBnZ+tTr/qR6VRSIagfKdMjaqyI 3sgbwPwooAcgU+cCJ7J6aAsVQxOGoHOquGFwiPLOH8vk2ZO3OCxZ9wB1V9fFYE0peYHS axOLN+8xVtajh4bwLcFoC9K1Adu4RpAHZuOJr1nyT7f/Qh87hH+76HVokohjvTc046Tu r2fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UQO0DLY5EGPuPlH1sEyHQcELoaN87Wae9x/UTTTvL3Y=; b=KkbpUoHMUqXpRDH+D237zFAHpUrIQWmj8RyKYuy3A58UQ704B9zFhO6a2Zv4vWcYYd NZmsXO3xv4WxfX1TJ32RbNuOPmm2rUHS4zV5oGSqMIUcHeSo9tGESWZfnU4GKnvltikI F3jT3mbz7A2vtRrLrx4OZQwZ29Y8yPrDI6unhFokvrE9dM3GhpuS3LmCxngQnGysNRpB na7sCU1JrFqQUYc0PDWRkl5TeOVgTjqjXn9IiANSedHluJLDfXtEAERzU7m2+Sko6PAc afDK65wIEwuPqKRwIlfwCwZqEGuUUZjQMXhyWXKLRCbXpt/W1RHtOnRAswOdVHxJkcWZ B1GA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2lToIvIG9E/P4Xb+zOHfaGwnOwm3qE0gBauIoPH5fRR/FrJ02+ EXYkQLNpTFG8pSVXIwolcpQ40aZFYoUP4Xp2xE4L3A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsdz6rNu/2Y6+YKWu/SL03qP2IK5lro5CTCTX1ZSJy6QM8/7KUzTeJifdHoqO0VDLQubnmfS6tSoND091t0EGc=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:2384:: with SMTP id u126mr15702286jau.64.1585654571964; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <335e336abe1b4368b3b4ea0c81759de8@semtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <335e336abe1b4368b3b4ea0c81759de8@semtech.com>
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:35:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nSrnb9TUSWYTBRg3BGr3+oeGk85TLUjT6rxpKMQoNBKqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olivier Gimenez <ogimenez@semtech.com>
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007fb4f005a224f94c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/IERW0Q5sKGSowRm0__5tjgv1yY4>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Question on draft-thubert-lpwan-command-reg-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:36:15 -0000
Hello Pascal and Olivier, I read your draft, and I was wondering, what is the need to do this? One of the most critical inputs we got from the SCHC CoAP draft review is how to get the initial context? Are you planning to do something in this way or this control and command are for other issues? Keep well! Ana On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 7:16 PM Olivier Gimenez <ogimenez@semtech.com> wrote: > Thank you Pascal for that draft, it seems good to me. > Also, I am lost on the IETF process: we discussed by email the way the > payload is encoded (ex: TLV) or acknowledged; should we include it in this > document or in each technology profile ? > > Best regards > Olivier > > > To view our privacy policy, including the types of personal information we > collect, process and share, and the rights and options you have in this > respect, see www.semtech.com/legal. > _______________________________________________ > lp-wan mailing list > lp-wan@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan >
- [lp-wan] Question on draft-thubert-lpwan-command-… Olivier Gimenez
- Re: [lp-wan] Question on draft-thubert-lpwan-comm… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [lp-wan] Question on draft-thubert-lpwan-comm… Ana Minaburo
- Re: [lp-wan] Question on draft-thubert-lpwan-comm… Olivier Gimenez