Re: [lp-wan] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7391)

Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Thu, 23 March 2023 16:54 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230319101450.7E0B356694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230319101450.7E0B356694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:54:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nQcZLeyMmqi5Vfg14W0xVu977pgev0BMqNH2a0wM_9V+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr, randreasen@fi.uba.ar, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, a@ackl.io, pthubert@cisco.com, marco.tiloca@ri.se, lp-wan@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ef869205f7942177"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/Vw5P6i0DysYqxClBj-gUjMEmqWY>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7391)
Precedence: list

Hello,
I reject this errata because the original text was:
"If the field value must be sent, TV is not set, MO is set to "ignore"

   and CDA is set to "value-sent. A mapping can also be used."


As you can see 'not set' has been transformed into 'not-sent' during
the edition. And I prefer to use this terminology that corresponds to
the RFC8724.


Thanks

Ana


On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:14 AM RFC Errata System <
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8824,
> "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the Constrained Application
> Protocol (CoAP)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7391
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca@ri.se>
>
> Section: 5.4
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> The SCHC Rule description MAY define sending some field values by
> setting the TV to "not-sent", the MO to "ignore", and the CDA to
> "value-sent".
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The SCHC Rule description MAY define sending some field values by
> describing an empty TV, with the MO set to "ignore" and the CDA set to
> "value-sent".
>
> Notes
> -----
> The new text indicates to use an empty TV, consistent with the intended
> CDA "value-sent".
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8824 (draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the
> Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
> Publication Date    : June 2021
> Author(s)           : A. Minaburo, L. Toutain, R. Andreasen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[lp-wan] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8824 (739… RFC Errata System
Re: [lp-wan] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8824 … Ana Minaburo