Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16 (Shepherd write-up)

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <> Mon, 11 June 2018 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844FA130E7E for <>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 13:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twAkCvmRIqFq for <>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 13:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E781E130DBE for <>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=9696; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1528750224; x=1529959824; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=wT8NK8hDUsazM0GVj5ZptravzBtRBX/6XGxyl/N7prA=; b=EC7/9oOocVdPpkvl+VmFkpb1KBZUOg0u3kin3bycY/WZ0xAKX5tLjGx9 OUdI+Ru2CZGUkKflNJzs8m1BH2v7y3gc/xlxb3bjqvP4CR7zRTX24NBAF xina+aBt7+9FndBPeFHlJ0TiV1tf+oZw0mpjPqhR19PVcLsMALe98p7Fs Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,211,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="406864998"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jun 2018 20:50:23 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5BKoNjF019331 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:50:23 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:50:22 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:50:22 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <>
To: Uma Chunduri <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16 (Shepherd write-up)
Thread-Index: AQHUAbkBwFGi/5lC9UWHvNegHbTkiqRbh/8w
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:50:22 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3803949de3084418b7aab8a27febc2adXCHALN001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16 (Shepherd write-up)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:50:28 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR other than what has already been disclosed.


From: Lsr <> On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 12:18 PM
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16 (Shepherd write-up)

Dear All,

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to ?

Sending this email as suggested by LSR chairs - as this was not noticed during/around WGLC.

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Uma C.