IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)

Sergey SHpenkov <sergey.v.shpenkov@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sergey.v.shpenkov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198203A0043 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:00:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYbnDbqb5JEf for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:00:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A68F3A0046 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:00:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id x2so3728715ila.9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:00:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dhfOn1tWs0Njzt1dnvy+A727slpSGs3CMcgwN4csZIA=; b=k4iLQ3rtTCURKf/Mu+URFouUklC8+D0gaBblPyI77CSqWw7KLwrokEHUCuRIOcJJrR W9NaY+exJlpU6Ez3ZEFUeSGuBou/Qw5STldAOUfxQPYTgzwyvwxh4M5bQybyo8fjGj5a H6tWwns5u2ZVOiBq6LD5dijMQH9qB86HeSQrRlTsJJODRFl+zRqSCVn67gNWK/+ULg3W A9NWqV3s8P40sXMl7zITC4wzCSKI7hx4+fpdjDjiRmghKKp+gGApNZ+WnKR5+ER+ftHw /Q8W4fP2Uy9cOwURzSDj6T4ZfvYlPjZjGvPiBieWHzHFexA4PCBnbOu9rAefvdCPfCUg oAQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=dhfOn1tWs0Njzt1dnvy+A727slpSGs3CMcgwN4csZIA=; b=BfJ1q1/rdIsRkyHoTvX/QslxEdcE2ef4o43rbJBzDGwzi6UfIhRW/ww/f6WCZWN7kE AuNUAliq8r0eRgSA26aD/qSoCn8xuwrk6Qy+bUe288qBSklx7mXXGPyUwXmjeqwEnNO0 h0W3XM8ikOOg/aQexz+Jr2SLmEITcZoRzySQwdrvuQekgiqwgEO5cX5Z6qyU87jy/gv9 rSExWCzCzHZSVJrPRjoBjmE5sMqHtgn6n6PqEkf3Wgu7i2FsrCUySKoaSivkf8bowKF3 g/pIwozUHQkRyLakHSqrRXzOuv5av5aNdktxHbgeYM4KGZ+E81j2kD3cSugc1+aSoWBC 1yOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3rFx8jWK6fvuhzrThkkuju/dRFCau9KTazQgXk727rYksNYVXi qzjg/92wbwIewrC2ksqgkRIE+pcPmIpRT2sKUmfHGNfV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtQbLjdxAxP+2iZh+8Iaf8oPMr/jvTLHcbmiU62czSH5gmOHfmMZr9YqNLPDr5jY+X1rRtE3p4tWu/UabmqVPI=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:194c:: with SMTP id e12mr5601069ilm.12.1583262044763; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:00:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD4HJpqOJC0DSeb_nrPOD3=bofRLgWzFhRrzXMnrtZRr0XNjsw@mail.gmail.com> <DDD60A40-5095-4973-B90D-556F4AC0B1F1@cisco.com> <CAD4HJppxJF9W6jXFRPiFy_RyZvAUiNCayBPqpy2jqrX7wGGcvw@mail.gmail.com> <D3640798-3B05-4500-AAD7-2A971ACCD822@cisco.com> <CAD4HJppx_2NSLV+JVwwkPex5-TBoddK-6Sms6i4xYbz=3H3j9w@mail.gmail.com> <C7326625-1E7F-4AFB-B89F-DAA5A0691958@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7326625-1E7F-4AFB-B89F-DAA5A0691958@cisco.com>
From: Sergey SHpenkov <sergey.v.shpenkov@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 21:58:19 +0300
Message-ID: <CAD4HJpq46R-8Q-feQGzZ0Q75syKuU9zhUbS-5bO1yFVOUTe6pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c3b914059ff7eb0a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/A2GZqyn4ZPvFhs1qgcUbr0PEnrA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 19:00:49 -0000

Hi Acee,

To solve this problem, before starting 16.3, it is possible that all ABR
routers (virtual endpoints) should update the cost of routes for ABRS (if
these routes exist in the backbone area) from all virtual neighbors in the
transit area, regardless of whether these costs have been improved or
worsened.

For example, router ABR_3 first checks sumLSA-4 from virtual neighbor ABR_1
in the transit area 0.0.0.200 and updates the cost for ABRS to 300 in the
backbone area. After that, the calculation begins on the router ABR_3 16.3.

It is a bad idea? :)

Thansk,
Sergey

пн, 2 мар. 2020 г. в 00:51, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>:

> Hi Sergey,
>
> Seems it is a real problem that needs a solution. Let’s continue the
> discussion.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> *From: *Sergey SHpenkov <sergey.v.shpenkov@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 4:41 PM
> *To: *Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)
>
>
>
> Hi Acee,
>
> Please tell me the discussion on the topic of "Question about OSPF
> (transit area routing loop)" can be considered complete?
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email