[Lsr] Robert Wilton's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-28: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for publishing another YANG model.

I do have a little sympathy to Roman's comment that having a bit more
descriptive prose at the beginning of this document might be helpful to readers
(i.e., I'm thinking in the order of one or two paragraphs).  But at the same
time, I can also see that repeating (or perhaps summarising) what is already
written in another RFC isn't necessarily that helpful, and having the details
in the YANG module itself is arguably the most important and useful place
because then the tooling can build appropriate GUI help text or user
documentation.

Regards,
Rob