Re: [Lsr] Request to consider Flood Reflection going into LC
Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 July 2021 07:57 UTC
Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6297E3A118B; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ttnKSnlz95Ez; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC26F3A1189; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id r16so11539967ilt.11; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PTDh97EtS+B110XdNsgCqC48CKF7iK2+4Nzm9/GSIGo=; b=PQzLUKbryzDQd5/PbrRrLLCfaLZ7zhfDxrCdDMuVSfkZ9o9lcsYgHecjEC0wQ7GfBx 1b2Qq9tCe1Werx5V8j3kTYJrTJcFjcuev5Upo963XSC+KwUES2TwWk36+cwgU9f+mCaZ yLwGJ5DuO9ALwUBIg2ePui5O4rZGBnApFdx2jWbWQbvACuXfJxaWuU/nLDiP8r2RpeDC WieZflDrV/Gvi6ZGR8YysUae24OwNLm989oBNT8ZVBUDEJ9khdF/zsQyDDJnf6JRlasJ 2KNen1bCi4Sh2Yr5voE+vEMbXwWKce6JTu24u0uS3Kxu9DytxaKbyyx2KKS1d/21CsnV tivw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=PTDh97EtS+B110XdNsgCqC48CKF7iK2+4Nzm9/GSIGo=; b=I57mEXm51HJuztHRxGzvR6+6DDRmdKNgyWTkdYUkYDj3l6u5XFbMrDfLco08xi9pXY x780MOqDoY4mcK2m50Izv9BHipTPJL3BRd6H00CVz3C7v+KaJUWAaYc4u52IfUceWazh /8HCGFjCJyPRqJvGoty/kvf1+dcYHkIXEC8gtZ00L+2mVao2K2veTzuN/akrs/wF2frp KkRf7Od7aAC8sKmLWMB+vnDd3ToAoKwpscrnAtgUG+WAmzVjpu3IQ5FR7f0m1HNS7oRh U3htyU2XHU1K1MMs7URwPZ2RaJI5+jpcn1vWf64sQOiRcVTrlchLSUHYJJrKhfSY8PJc 5vXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sgg2jXkv0QvfBk4KFEmPY0+42D84/i3B/f3iaZAdPcc/EUAA3 DhblSGsf4PgMQNnYDJJ+ZHkKmncOjrbkeJWi8bzpOH1ENUuPzkFO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHViJkhRhvI0x3QzNg8lTRXT6JLLHhHLzIIckuQsAKch8MDPHgik5QPpugeANidz0B2ICeiJNaZK3GoCQvq4Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:3004:: with SMTP id x4mr37705412ile.269.1626076666686; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+wi2hNandutfv_ctSXGoa3Fp0aX70AXC3HyNfOs2eoE6VZ_uw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hNandutfv_ctSXGoa3Fp0aX70AXC3HyNfOs2eoE6VZ_uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:57:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMprcFiJtZUd4fnikTnAjq9YCDXd8LCQthh233yartMnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>, lsr-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000018739a05c6e87a3f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/DEOLl1aawSD5VnLwryeuyDY7eiM>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request to consider Flood Reflection going into LC
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:57:50 -0000
speaking of which, can I have 5 mins on the agenda for update flood reflection draft v2/v3? earlier in the session would be merciful since it's 1am-3am session on Fri for me. thx. tony On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:26 AM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear chairs, flood reflection is implemented/shipped and deploying and > we’re on early alloc codepoints that expire start Aug’. No further > discussions on the list happened. > > As far as we see as authors stuff looks shaken out, all things that were > found in implementation/use are in the latest draft version and I’d like to > test the waters of LC’ing it rather than dragging it on as draft and asking > for temporary alloc again which does not seem to serve a purpose AFAIS. > > thanks > > -- tony >
- [Lsr] Request to consider Flood Reflection going … Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] Request to consider Flood Reflection go… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] Request to consider Flood Reflection go… Acee Lindem (acee)