[Lsr] Request to consider Flood Reflection going into LC

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 July 2021 05:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7761F3A1122 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XSp0GHmHT0iI for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 206023A1117 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id k11so11168303ioa.5 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 22:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Z7M9YGDwGPWW+F15OpJYMno/OPZ41Di+dGtY15sZKzE=; b=E+6MsoWt5lEF1hEH/G5gLD+U6ELX1Vq+NN1sBGp+nVBfUOo5R5ZO5Gxzf5vE4OHSoD GGpOwyAl/k5RZEZH9tfCjl3tLjqc/53ScH3QR+31pOtBanikusIhrQfR2wwcMmFdb85H w1x2+ST2A+GHujcuHpaDuOiCys8B9tEJCTwIU3R2YK5wqPZnmOr/vc7pCpIM/0moIxVp H7zT/TfW+t22wphZ0ijXgeEbPlHNsN0t26nK/lL9c6cH+LLhxx8z2FKv/mmkNDVoXG2A Ggr+y7im+T5uaDiLcsI5LD62cqAA5Cht2c70cHOIDuZxB6tGpcvgn2f3l2FNRNCk4u3r GRqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Z7M9YGDwGPWW+F15OpJYMno/OPZ41Di+dGtY15sZKzE=; b=F5hLfg7q9VYq39UzVOOB6Ub9SpkmwQ8ZBD8BEkMkZHWs/51gyR/31KQ5htEptAlN/4 2+6sY90OSvsdF5dm8+3ZwPYA2EdePA/4lmSdyZvLIKs+XkxvbCBGH1m2mpbbYkp9vApG Uv3zfvPEaG/DYqTGbwZsu0JFyGyZX1LSPj+aWW88cTIHhr2RvZkZ2ThAIOTmurXduYU9 oyWj8gZhG8uTHxtW+KMv3xNu2qPnpHEGP1Vat8Tr+1FihJFRRKo0TZyle6QoOdScK7ZS Xyxh3rlpfaaXaCycML3aRGEGOqzwkLDAbaY9My38rnT15IV0GI95LAx5Kic0wQVZAIl5 KbXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307MgzgIRfW6/y/ADPd2GhtPrw55ZsVEsKEtq0z/Gv8rku9EOSp KjgAWqtJ2AFurCYcJLRS9QETYV49DUAwmnLr9vsBZ6bnQdjWH7HqKYc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcrWmw1xKAM5yxVqD8ff9QM8R1ZNkSi19U5jk06NSEHBeiRVnBp2QPgfY5HDl79o8S3SypevkjBaLx14f9ceQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b5c7:: with SMTP id e190mr27653588iof.31.1625808413797; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 22:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 07:26:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hNandutfv_ctSXGoa3Fp0aX70AXC3HyNfOs2eoE6VZ_uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa332205c6aa04ae"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/EujcZxB-aAbA3ew-0FfnPuoOLXM>
Subject: [Lsr] Request to consider Flood Reflection going into LC
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 05:27:01 -0000

Dear chairs, flood reflection is implemented/shipped and deploying and
we’re on early alloc codepoints that expire start Aug’. No further
discussions on the list happened.

As far as we see as authors stuff looks shaken out, all things that were
found in implementation/use are in the latest draft version and I’d like to
test the waters of LC’ing it rather than dragging it on as draft and asking
for temporary alloc again which does not seem to serve a purpose AFAIS.

thanks

-- tony