IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt

"Toy, Mehmet" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com> Sun, 23 August 2020 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0369B3A107B for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=BwzUXL6H; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verizon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b=RxYkgCGF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9xi3_r6krmc for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com (mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com [148.163.153.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4FF3A1079 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0112646.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07N1A7VT093926 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:18:34 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon.com; h=mime-version : from : date : message-id : subject : to : content-type; s=corp; bh=oCQH7q5uJ2WejRj3ECFDULXQClqYh7joypaftLeXn6M=; b=BwzUXL6HKMWXh7vK5Cf4bKKroyEjTdQP/c8zVjL3WE25gzVQ5bjJpai/b84ZLXPO30JO 8GzW5JG11dDkfgjXsAxvd/h9bKoLr4AB7sS+WPF3rSRwojXEkupbd/0fbfvSrNVSg0a1 ri3ZlPlqNRFGiv40wzQwEoXczqTIKeVVm4c=
Received: from mail-qt1-f200.google.com (mail-qt1-f200.google.com [209.85.160.200]) by mx0b-0024a201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 332vsym65c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:18:34 -0400
Received: by mail-qt1-f200.google.com with SMTP id k1so4144023qtp.20 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oCQH7q5uJ2WejRj3ECFDULXQClqYh7joypaftLeXn6M=; b=RxYkgCGFcAu5pqm4v1S+nAXHlNktFJ1syycm0ecDbWvQxR3ElCvW+pBrDVhrTgtOqg vLkl7Ur3jt5rKt4ZsIJgvMc0L+bVLpxxk/waF64GFx+Nkumr84D04zaDgxZI3coygtmh 81BQjfWnbRs+TB+k8b7gNtdh11drR7JAfTCA0HYp66kuOpsqr27rz6+n2mS7NPFM7ATF Y2H9LGz2GM/mVuM86C2w2ad5Z+1zc2EDRy75PxBij9d0pL1rX3/RHnq0Bq96ypV/tRuc LaCbKPZ8E3Rh1v8GgKaJb1CFnFEwaq7wisJVvRRoZWUySsHAT9y1XSID9d935MqEp2y2 kb8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oCQH7q5uJ2WejRj3ECFDULXQClqYh7joypaftLeXn6M=; b=WRYsa+vq99W5u6goAFFP1nU809FzqqfVnkY7hKEfSnoX0lQ5s9digOvjGN2yRuKtc1 WZhVe/06yaVl0Kzz2Mt1ju4iXrTi0qncQD/0NKAJxWTulh6VpKyg77EsK5oHX0HWOAn+ nJD4oR57oGdsulfT2YWgU2nM2c0+O0G95QdXnYQHo33rPLCG33fSL7p+FKpj/nEXhffi hpoEGLUy3YBU3r5txf62y7X54XBjfWZmk/K5e+40H/nYBVYRNRt8a5uJ8eidbRr0SMtB dXQv2GwbWV9fZqP4uFSeiago++c2p2MFQAUEqXlFsXln8L3xWglV1D4P/dUKvd0z7Qqv N2ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532P2BOKljFbK8u2xu5Iv4JWZeWU6jhLFyy8ZiicuHs5/24gEGAZ Vux1wF/+CYwXORfjaidJhNH8wjV7Fg5bSDTE/VIzvDJzlDoKc90uQwafIiP9gfrqyn18198G9hg mtJWePM8ygHkOXgjjEYo=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1349:: with SMTP id f9mr9056794qtj.24.1598145513294; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyB0KqH7u0UM87SoY3gkzSewZOkoA5We91LnC+mcn597TU2YfOWFngNGcxHTYqmjaQM3bLgh1RYPILBdxjETVo=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1349:: with SMTP id f9mr9056768qtj.24.1598145512697; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Toy, Mehmet" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:18:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKr6JWv-edQkhjEa760WXwEw+YTdfuyfHDoa=W_d=PcGtc+2cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsr@ietf.org, acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000958bf305ad813f8e"
X-mailroute: internal
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=out_spam_notspam policy=out_spam score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=1 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008230008
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/FKnHJK9Hz4K9gJoMPl73plcEhvI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 01:18:38 -0000

Support adoption of  "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" -
draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt .
Thanks
Mehmet


------------------------------
*From:* Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:16 AM
*To:* lsr@ietf.org <lsr@ietf.org>
*Subject:* [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone"
- draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt




Based on the discussions in the last meeting and on the mailing list
regarding draft-chen-isis-ttz-11, the chairs feel that there are enough
differences with draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03 and in the community to
consider advancing it independently on the experimental track.



These differences include abstraction at arbitrary boundaries and IS-IS
extensions for smooth transition to/from zone abstraction.



We are now starting an LSR WG adoption call for draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt.
Please indicate your support or objection to adoption prior to Tuesday,
September 2nd, 2020.



Thanks,

Acee and Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email