Re: [Lsr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08: (with COMMENT)

[[e-mail]]

Erik,

Thank you for your review and comments.

Please see inline [Bruno]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2024 9:02 PM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CAUTION : This email originated outside the company. Do not click on any links or open attachments unless you are expecting them from the sender.
>
> ATTENTION : Cet e-mail provient de l'extérieur de l'entreprise. Ne cliquez pas sur les liens ou n'ouvrez pas les pièces jointes à moins de connaitre l'expéditeur.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> # Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08
> CC @ekline
>
> * comment syntax:
  > - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
>
> * "Handling Ballot Positions":
  > - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
>
> ## Comments
>
> * I like that it's Experimental, but it might be good to have text around
  > what a "successful experiment" would like for when/if this comes back
  > around to be elevated to Standards Track.
>
>   I'm assuming a successful experiment includes plenty of "plugfest"
  > interoperability testing.  But of more interest would be having some
  > report about congestion control lessons learned (vis S6 proposals).

[Bruno] Actually we do have data and report about this and we presented main points to the LSR WG during IETF 111.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/slides-111-lsr-22-flow-congestion-control-00.pdf
But only with a single implementation (Free Range Routing)

Best regards,
--Bruno
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.