[Lsr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Comments

* I like that it's Experimental, but it might be good to have text around
  what a "successful experiment" would like for when/if this comes back
  around to be elevated to Standards Track.

  I'm assuming a successful experiment includes plenty of "plugfest"
  interoperability testing.  But of more interest would be having some
  report about congestion control lessons learned (vis S6 proposals).