Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts
Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 02 May 2018 04:06 UTC
Return-Path: <umac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC825127444; Tue, 1 May 2018 21:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H0gxu5sY6ikl; Tue, 1 May 2018 21:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x241.google.com (mail-ua0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A914127775; Tue, 1 May 2018 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x241.google.com with SMTP id i3so8593725uad.4; Tue, 01 May 2018 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RTN527g7Vk08U8y337spm/ekhiFufCHzrdGXtKdIKKA=; b=dP/gt2SiXOAYPYOk7+tkMd+4I8PIJ+03e8G/z5+9xsrkBjVs/kfCnHhDM6IMdCvdKm ISAYtREUtPMvFqUl2rSqfd6jYEoXuGBLnjuidKi2crlRYhGSqf3DZCOZH9Uo5DEtSpvW 0sVcT8fc+LHs2oXDJiJW7MDAI7eNTQIbOsoEvIdLPMME0KP98lENZa29kfqH1bFaRmT4 D8JahSoeCklFc1BBE2/eDhcAP9KD+ycQtew5eSRFbf3/sWij84A7SFZlkSplrUsCTj7E XYIP2gkTAqzUffHyRqALgyjim6tr5JgesHxalM1kk4q3coW2G3C2WtgKv8htB0CzukGE QKoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RTN527g7Vk08U8y337spm/ekhiFufCHzrdGXtKdIKKA=; b=NauU5gIRi77mAn+uWshvadA/zu6n5ubT+6q5hhwdD799xrcmeHIgAkKWRSV4mwtvs0 qv8CuIFH4Jxlh7bVw3IKBzC9WUMwxUw31qzA55sHZZQCnH18860OFsns/mDVEig3d0YR 46hyySUAs5Z2FrzK3E2d2N05Wpf/R6cVRqxmUYDVvDyHoQTUJO7PSyvikpDg3ivBQ4Kh n7hzEH/n1rE6AB4KY0xHKqBTt3A4xylSp5zn7pm4+ChYI17exPa88zRZVGZI+k3NvWV5 oquODPed6Om9zMq5R+Rn0qRRRfq4TIIeuUStmKckeXtIjtfzQNe/ZlMuqmJMbyaPJT1U NzDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tClkfLfKxuHHMx6WDpvxXWHua5iGQa4lmv1/alI+NX9FnR3/Z0x BMvRioB6CS+QJgeS0VLn6VCa5N+iaJED1Idapjs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrIITJLsMvJL6qM18WEIMEq4J3kgVvV0oinTPltWKUdrvkmYskrBdQGYL6FuYeRZ317bW9/6Z3+39JAyMi4Rbc=
X-Received: by 10.159.40.35 with SMTP id c32mr17614526uac.193.1525233997338; Tue, 01 May 2018 21:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.140.4 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2018 21:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5AD5BEDF.1010603@cisco.com>
References: <6C9DDF29-72D8-4630-82AD-342CC134EB36@cisco.com> <5ACF0C41.1090506@cisco.com> <2FF54200-BFCB-4492-BE21-441192D48BAE@cisco.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685413553D22@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com> <5AD5BEDF.1010603@cisco.com>
From: Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 21:06:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF18ct4ze19-mGWiEobcmiqD0KmLOqQAVBcDHHctRa4ooYpdOw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Cc: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org" <draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c048be09c5baa056b31369d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/JC0n856KIyQTCQAZjyjNqA433-Q>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 04:06:49 -0000
> > > these are being renamed in the next update to: > > Flex-Algorithm - Single octet value between 128 and 255 inclusive > > > IGP Alg. Type - Single octet. Value between 0 and 127 inclusive, that > identifies IGP algorithm type used to compute paths for the Flex-Algoritm. > Values are defined in "IGP Algorithm Types" registry defined under > "Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters" IANA registries Hi Peter, The above change would conflict https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml (where it is defined till 255) and cause changes to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-25 (Which is in RFC Editor queue) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/ (In WG LC) Are we going in that direction? I still see "Flex-Algorithm" is light-weight sub-topology with constrains and still computed using one of the Algorithms as specified in https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml. Kindly avoid confusion around the terminology here, plz - Thx! -- Uma C.
- [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG/Singapore)
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts Peter Psenak