IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 12 April 2018 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D370126C3D; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 02:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DzvH5Hvk2n1O; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 02:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92163124319; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 02:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2460; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1523526764; x=1524736364; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ieTYSOk41jwFl0lH32TaYr2e17WnoV7rHpweC2QTRzw=; b=cYjOpMhRm2T62V0iJA+iYSmzzPfcBM7AqD14I4E/EBDv5Syw78hoVNZh T5IFB+Brtx4cWeIxAl3ooWD67Z0Rmfq1e+pnmmikmIx+lxOdN7cLooErV RGze9LkSc9Oi9CbeM8VPbqzzFhc8zJNre+bUOs8WScjFAc+ug7Jl06XV2 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DwAAD/K89a/4UNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNCgVAoCoNZiAKNDoFTIYEPkmOBewuFAwIagh0hNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJsKIUiAQEBAQIBIxFFEAIBCBgCAiYCAgIwFRACBAENBYUFCKdWghyEV4Nqgi+BCYZ0ghOBDgEjDIJchHMXgmkwgiQChxCJT4Z+CAKONYxEj2sCERMBgSQBHDiBUnAVZAGCGJBOb41qgRcBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,441,1517875200"; d="scan'208";a="162280217"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Apr 2018 09:52:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3C9qh5o028657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:52:43 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 05:52:42 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 05:52:42 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org" <draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Flex Algorithms Drafts
Thread-Index: AQHT0jDWOZBa0wS8LkeTFGZb8vTAkaP845qA
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:52:42 +0000
Message-ID: <2FF54200-BFCB-4492-BE21-441192D48BAE@cisco.com>
References: <6C9DDF29-72D8-4630-82AD-342CC134EB36@cisco.com> <5ACF0C41.1090506@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5ACF0C41.1090506@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.200]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <019BD317BDE27A40876188E3DECE4A64@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/8XgiuYQGU_-8fgQomU_WkCzQcn0>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:52:46 -0000

Hi Peter, 

Ok - we'll decide during whether to merge during the WG adoption call. It would be a good LSR experiment for a combined draft if there are no significant differences between the protocols that would make a combined draft unwieldy. 

Thanks,
Acee



On 4/12/18, 3:35 AM, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com> wrote:

    Hi Acee,
    
    On 11/04/18 22:36 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
    > In preparation for WG adoption and IANA early code point allocation, I suggest that we rename the “Flexible Algorithm Definition TLV Metric Registry” to the “Flexible Algorithm Definition TLV Metric Type Registry” to avoid confusion as to whether we are defining the actual metrics here. I know that in the contexts of the drafts, it is clear but the registries are going to be on their own. Additionally, while protocol TLV types should not be shared between protocols, it seems this registry could be common and placed in our "Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters" registry.
    
    sure I can make that change.
    
    >
    > Finally, the OSPF version has a typo in section 8.2. The last two types should be 2 and 3.
    
    right, will fix it.
    >
    >     o  0 - Reserved
    >
    >     o  1 - Flexible Algorithm Exclude Admin Group Sub-TLV
    >
    >     o  1 - Flexible Algorithm Include-Any Admin Group Sub-TLV
    >
    >     o  1 - Flexible Algorithm Exclude-All Group Sub-TLV
    >
    > Also, how so the authors feel about combining the drafts? I know the IS-IS version has had more discussion and wouldn't want to hold it up if there is a possibility. I don't feel strongly one way or another.
    
    I'm fine both ways.
    
    thanks,
    Peter
    
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Acee
    >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email