[Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9013 (6576)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 07 May 2021 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EFB3A3103 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 13:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tUecLPTNhKy for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 13:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4D83A3104 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2021 13:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 562A2F407E2; Fri, 7 May 2021 13:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: xiaohu.xu@capitalonline.net, bruno.decraene@orange.com, robert@raszuk.net, luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com, luay.jalil@verizon.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, akr@cisco.com, acee@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, lsr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210507201202.562A2F407E2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 13:12:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/KFfsmNJjfu5jGlvaJakCitzEvtA>
Subject: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9013 (6576)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 20:12:34 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9013,
"OSPF Advertisement of Tunnel Encapsulations".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6576

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Sabrina Tanamal <drafts-update-ref@iana.org>

Section: 7.2

Original Text
-------------
| 3           | Endpoint             | RFC 9013            |

Corrected Text
--------------
| 3           | Tunnel Egress Endpoint| RFC 9013           |
 

Notes
-----
The description of value 3 should have been updated to match updates throughout the text.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC9013 (draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : OSPF Advertisement of Tunnel Encapsulations
Publication Date    : April 2021
Author(s)           : X. Xu, Ed., B. Decraene, Ed., R. Raszuk, L. Contreras, L. Jalil
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG