IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-isis-mfi-00.txt

Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> Fri, 26 February 2021 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E959E3A13A3 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:44:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yTA8db_K2BL6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:44:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.223]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1553A13A6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:44:26 -0800 (PST)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.92:20639.2025136077
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-111.194.46.55?logid-bea472ac0b124d2694a4c599149766e3 (unknown [172.18.0.92]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 27957280079; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:44:19 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040164@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.92]) by App0021 with ESMTP id bea472ac0b124d2694a4c599149766e3 for tony.li@tony.li; Fri Feb 26 19:44:25 2021
X-Transaction-ID: bea472ac0b124d2694a4c599149766e3
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.92
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-C356E13A-3116-45FD-BC07-498B96A31006"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:44:14 +0800
Message-Id: <7D53A65F-7375-43BC-9C4E-2EDCF8E138C8@chinatelecom.cn>
References: <CAOj+MMHsDgfD8avbRtvthhd0=c-X25L9HBc0yQTby4vFQKECLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: wangyali <wangyali11@huawei.com>, Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>, lsr@ietf.org, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHsDgfD8avbRtvthhd0=c-X25L9HBc0yQTby4vFQKECLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18D52)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/LsKE2tSDG0RzQX5_SqMWFrrCEac>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-isis-mfi-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:44:32 -0000

Hi, Robert:

Separate into different protocol instances can accomplish the similar task, but it has some deployment overhead.
MFIs within one instance can avoid such cumbersome work, and doesn’t affect the basic routing calculation process.

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> On Feb 26, 2021, at 19:00, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Yali,
>  
>> If this was precise, then the existing multi-instance mechanism would be sufficient.
>> [Yali]: MFI is a different solution we recommend to solve this same and valuable issue.
> 
> Well the way I understand this proposal MFI is much weaker solution in terms of required separation. 
> 
> In contrast RFC8202 allows to separate ISIS instances at the process level, but here MFIs as defined must be handled by the same ISIS process 
> 
>    This document defines an extension to
>    IS-IS to allow one standard instance of 
>    the protocol to support multiple update 
>    process operations.
> 
> Thx,
> R.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email