[Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Backward compatibility

There is text in Appendix A that provides guidance to implementers on how to
handle TLVs with length 5 from RFC7810. I think this would be much more helpful
inside the main body of the document. I was wondering how the backward
compatibility was handled until I read through the Appendix that lists the
*diffs*.