Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Fri, 15 May 2020 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401023A0928; Fri, 15 May 2020 04:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zM5FrCqy4qGS; Fri, 15 May 2020 04:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47CD3A0924; Fri, 15 May 2020 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1397; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1589542094; x=1590751694; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Y/w7wiJAKHpEJ6+wIinUYIKk8+MmH8tH9ygp+cez7s=; b=U6m5g99DnY/1WnqM56HTG7/HZWj1n2xEtPsqa8EXMYKuMRFDnwErbPSz phO8V8h5umJbDUKXiIH784pjX7gcJAxjKeCW7V9/yYoThi2bwEhtSOojw v13CjNUpSz03GbwcjQV3BBglgVaNv7e3dSh69etn2dSWUyiGv9F8oB+/D w=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,395,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="26229657"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 15 May 2020 11:28:12 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04FBSBM3016436; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:28:11 GMT
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
References: <158950595036.5639.14249690264747935521@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <c463544f-0397-bc06-a65a-e6c42a1cadcd@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:28:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158950595036.5639.14249690264747935521@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/W0VUn5EmjZASiNyJ7ugkihQ70PM>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:28:16 -0000

Hi Warren,

On 15/05/2020 03:25, Warren Kumari via Datatracker wrote:
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Nit: “ When an OSPF Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) redistributes a
> prefix from another instance of the OSPF or from some other protocol,   it
> SHOULD preserve the ELC signaling for the prefix.“
> 
> S/the /OSPF/OSPF/.

fixed.

> 
> S/for the prefix/for the prefix (if it exists)/ — some protocols will not have
> / carry the ELC.

fixed.

> 
> Apologies if I missed it, but I didn’t see discussion on *exporting* ELC into
> other protocols...

what do you mean by "exporting"?

thanks,
Peter

> 
> 
> 
> 
>