Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Warren,

On 15/05/2020 03:25, Warren Kumari via Datatracker wrote:
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Nit: “ When an OSPF Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) redistributes a
> prefix from another instance of the OSPF or from some other protocol,   it
> SHOULD preserve the ELC signaling for the prefix.“
> 
> S/the /OSPF/OSPF/.

fixed.

> 
> S/for the prefix/for the prefix (if it exists)/ — some protocols will not have
> / carry the ELC.

fixed.

> 
> Apologies if I missed it, but I didn’t see discussion on *exporting* ELC into
> other protocols...

what do you mean by "exporting"?

thanks,
Peter

> 
> 
> 
> 
>