IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 05 March 2019 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DEF1288BD for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:12:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssmBY56Xaamo for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:12:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FC64124D68 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:12:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id z39so10518997qtz.0 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:12:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uxr4b+V7DVWDcLdcUGCq09O1yqFjOX8d2cZjGeRicjc=; b=RgNYrSSHAD490IVSIlA+M+qbSnYyA24SmivxU9mOJ01GVPiORcc9MmK0S65DftTjGA LG8raAslE/EWeht6VP234MRq7gD509leby0e0jqcrubZddpETo2Tsa/ttIzz/wybmRnS atuXN7TFcXmw17Ma2wmZqvXpJf5YKTuoBqRHZSz80QN4SRXS+k67A6OUpl/4cF6BRN/c 3hRV23T3FKz0FMfr7CwVybNr0PDSCPqiqgAk8abFgCb4HWJd6gixIUbFzLt5Tu84ndZ4 NzS4vIdsj1aYeZ586tCR9LxOQe7a4sFh0El/pHRP8kAd2FYgBqsXLsObHzEW+MgMpbrI xEbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uxr4b+V7DVWDcLdcUGCq09O1yqFjOX8d2cZjGeRicjc=; b=XsrtP9wqkysQRpTvwP2GEF0VY/d2HyCH/eo0YmjsL15PPiMW2aJQLML+GPU7R3aEzc cuDkyOjAWRduojQ8Wqb1ndm3c4/xWv6MVr1gmdE1CaRzL6+Jmh/3N6Rff7hNEUWaprEs ZaPRkKNMTD9pKVTVLN0ge/w1vez2NlFwG1V1hhNNY8zgOEWyHfYtO6jQ1suW6VA6uO4i tHsRtt40l/8rfGkUWsTYQ7WTD+kJY/h8knMh9lq0SqqqKOIzOEN6QVWYPnUf560VKmS+ zI4xkr0bLzgksQamqON1a40KSXvm0aUM6vkaPqyTt7llHHN2jH7wyOX+I9IxtAkgFN+k 0voA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXou4wXtFq+PrVAFek4tcbjrtVupNJ4rzqU420tY24kRx6gKh6X qv2z4rktLYKg3+kzwVpM22bSVspp7uzHWjhmKF8rXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUNgSDbmuxOF8PaVTxSD9sXILf/DfQgmcl6Y9SScB/Jx3mpvYwcDL6aC6oTYmlJimnGIEkVQNYb70n9NjVp/s=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2ce4:: with SMTP id 33mr3129863qtx.6.1551820331921; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:12:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AAD29CF0-F0CA-4C3C-B73A-78CD2573C446@tony.li> <c1adac3a-cd4b-130e-d225-a5f40bf0ef55@cisco.com> <F3C4B9B2-F101-4E28-8928-9208D5EBAF99@tony.li> <be28dbcf-8382-329a-229f-5b146538fabe@cisco.com> <CA+wi2hPt-UrekyA9LpCWJHo9KyaOR1=eVQD29y54sciv3zh10A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMGPp=DffEw7vS4PH_vDtmYL5y2Xxgx2utNt4R6cxsCiwg@mail.gmail.com> <41bd7097-0d25-a2e0-843d-cb25fd13a84f@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMHmi-Ch43=YJ=LphPxiJmoHyg1fovqnT5iJxB6ASPfUXQ@mail.gmail.com> <f1888bd8-e54e-2a3b-57a4-a05c632c6c7e@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <f1888bd8-e54e-2a3b-57a4-a05c632c6c7e@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 22:12:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMG0m98A9ckWcrWDhAJPADy=Q=YfgMkez0JsF9H90wPjHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Cc: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>, lsr@ietf.org, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a3c63c05835f53b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/WfMkF6d2UYAIk5pdkH_NkAZPvmA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:12:15 -0000

> we want to limit the flooding to minimum, which is 2.
>

Is that really a common agreement in the WG ? I have a feeling think this
is too restrictive for no valid technical reason.

r.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email