IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F16131088; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 01:27:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, L_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgZ892-_ixW2; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 01:27:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E99131073; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 01:27:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=808; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1551778065; x=1552987665; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dqush3hH6m/e4x7XwRAz4UpMrLejUPJaxfP5q2lRJRQ=; b=D8Nio6s+8msYt0Fy9HpGEdDpD2caX0MDAddihOPzTdEDsqDwPaZHNPoG sEOoL0+YEBjAuVyrKhcB7RIptiI+PECH3eg5P+lAG1NivrgHgnt/2jwtQ ch+BRkbPYZPMQhvHxrbOyZT4rgVsklZq5aetBSZhf49PB0pZgb6MBeM37 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAABKP35c/xbLJq1kGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUgMBAQEBAQsBgndxEieECIh5jFIlgzeUaoF7DRgNhEcChEk1CA0BAQMBAQMBAwJtHAyFSgEBAQECAQEBIRU2GwkCGAICJgICJzAGAQwGAgEBgx4BgW0ID40Km2aBL4QzAoEPhGMFgQskAYs+gUA/gTgMgjEugx4BAQOEaIJXApExklUJh0OLKwYZinqILIplhVyMcYFJATWBVjMaCBsVO4JsiwyFQD4DMJEVAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,443,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="10549271"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Mar 2019 09:27:42 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.27] ([10.147.24.27]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x259Rfiw007647; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:27:41 GMT
To: "徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>, Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org>, "tony.li" <tony.li@tony.li>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <AAD29CF0-F0CA-4C3C-B73A-78CD2573C446@tony.li> <c1adac3a-cd4b-130e-d225-a5f40bf0ef55@cisco.com> <94f6103c-f465-4ba0-91cf-9db8844c26a1.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <7f0d25e8-2789-2276-49f8-1c296f9cd03e@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:27:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <94f6103c-f465-4ba0-91cf-9db8844c26a1.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.147.24.27, [10.147.24.27]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/gwK681H24uIiThirhDuf-BGHI7Q>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 09:27:53 -0000

Xiaohu,

On 05/03/2019 09:48 , 徐小虎(义先) wrote:
>
>
>
>> Given that all links between routers are p2p these days, I would vote
>> for simplicity and make the LAN always part of the FT.
>
> Even all links between routers are P2P these days, the network
> management LAN if available could be leveraged to realize an efficient
> link-state synchronization among  these routers. In other words, the
> management LAN itself is now the FT
> (see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-lsr-isis-flooding-reduction-in-msdc-01).

sure. What I proposed would not impact the above in any negative way.

thanks,
Peter

>
> Best regards,
> Xiaohu
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email