IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 17 June 2020 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A173A0A34; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=cICy+3UH; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=bSwZsXaP
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9jmajWEJD22; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D10703A0A31; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2672; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1592395734; x=1593605334; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=BJccnsiVpJm+cJVN07qvVEsR8dKMG6KRYuQPXYuu+Ec=; b=cICy+3UHxKjQmsmYhzYopeViG6ZDs6s6XdX5YPqFEGgTrSngUibwWUxe 7jnb5env4vnHkrRbTpIsn0xuLmBCa+byFrYz3Iir4jClhhyJn4c8NnnlS CshtCpvQnJQD3PU5cv2lqLv/vuoFqzXU1QiSdrhh1MJpt7ECw7fIfAzJJ 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:CI5bYRQNPK8Yw0B1lo6dTh45adpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESQB9mJ5/dNkeGQsq38VyoH+5nS+HwBcZkZURgDhI1WmgE7G8eKBAX9K+KidC01GslOFToHt3G2OERYAoDyMlvVpHDh4TsbAB65NAdpKKLyAIGBx8iy3vq5rpvUZQgAjTGhYLR0eROxqwiZtsQfjYZ4bKgrzR6cqXpTcOMQzmRtdl8=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DCAACTBupe/4cNJK1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQFAgUoCgVBRB29YLywKh2ADjT2YUoJSA1ULAQEBDAEBGAsKAgQBAYRFAoIaAiQ5BQ0CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVsMhXIBAQEBAwEBECgGAQEsCwELBAIBCBEEAQEBHhAnCx0IAgQBDQUIGoMFgksDLgEDC6tMAoE5iGF0gTSDAQEBBYVBGIIOAwaBOAGCZIl2GoFBP4FUgk0+glwBAQKBX4NFgi2RaaJdCoJamT+CcI40jUSRHZ4zAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFrIYFWcBU7gmlQFwINjh4MF4NOhRSFQnQCNQIGCAEBAwl8jmMBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,522,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="508960669"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 Jun 2020 12:08:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05HC8q4r031135 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:08:52 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:08:52 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:08:51 -0400
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:08:51 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HteF1Ne3yjQNAIX1nIeiNFUDHUzXP115iDs0Z/4iE9+IdUEsk1AwjMBNfV1Iv+86MMM6OkYbIP4NItCjd1yW9h1m3J/HOXU7RJRHWyaIwvnCWnEfikVDiILc3Tf3P4eIc1cssjm+YAtqAx2uvwTGYG3BanfNUZmsimjzrhhsaDaJrVUvkBzuahmDT2h45aAfgnWEMLs1G7/JyTg7yp7hlELWhka0lLXPvuUhJqFPHwclvqpDSV2o5aSsM/fQiFJR2ZWXpDwIfrFEKW0G1LNv5JpJ4yiG8KMRGSEnbj1SCtPkaOvBl4gY+irwezzCEkH2RfBQmKl9UdFVftPdTM95Qw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xf3GLNNcasD+L1dsMWmX0QCYQOcifsNYmOosIJ0YU4o=; b=Zv6xQwC86oEwv19NHSckBlJkPyUSoUWQz73nsaiHQLUVt6Xzcwmf0sQt7DXyxpmCMefS+jfSu1jAJ23aNF0Ef5NpK6R5t9Tfuimd60QP5PcPiZa8zqQJEWuPySx1oXpFlAIJcCklf67SmYOkkKykkU+NQ2iq3e4CbcJ7rd6WuGuj5B++UOV9Ed2FMddkqj871W5EqNJFAZMxItb1nemBhX62ztgI0AEL0C+f9p+cDVH7fIn7vx+0OuIrYyRyRZZ8RJfBkZh1WuyIr2ZDy+w8jikYx7Yg5yHW6mvrVobSH2UQKXSQrAxbZaG+n6RQ+CsE8paSTkJFy40PHIEq8fSKJw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xf3GLNNcasD+L1dsMWmX0QCYQOcifsNYmOosIJ0YU4o=; b=bSwZsXaPKpB1x19IVdFLvc0w1aszJewvyHy5r30cyPHqahUH6n8VCzFVeFqxCc/lZUe7wiSsnR7n+AuTMh5Kdw2PD43Tp5id9/svVNbztcPAe1h/6oPh32d/mjKjyjXh76sil7Ccmau8Rp1tu2FQpVcvgKWsl2k9bC8pC54C3UM=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB4661.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:26b::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3088.25; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:08:50 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e9d4:79b5:aef1:be18]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e9d4:79b5:aef1:be18%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3088.029; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:08:50 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14
Thread-Index: AQHWQoFLB9JLWKZnNUeJIIEPbeYq6ajZZdiAgAAROYCAAz5EMA==
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:08:50 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB43663988FDD9EEEB446E87EAB59A0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159216255398.11973.1707971108773200684@ietfa.amsl.com> <a26e9fc3-5abc-b992-ade1-940a32054aec@cisco.com> <BBE540DC-3B08-4E0E-89A3-E472C6F4EA52@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBE540DC-3B08-4E0E-89A3-E472C6F4EA52@sobco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.15.79.32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 923f913f-23a0-46cb-3cba-08d812b7321e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4661:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4661AD2B16C522BD7B5E3E0CB59A0@MN2PR11MB4661.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-forefront-prvs: 04371797A5
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ClRyeB6a7FrnIQUFsjiEKwa8Ik29pVSPrCDA6GUsjmuiPrcH/CXOmqdScp6jGhQnXO7thbq+fFGsS9e0y+LcTnwIb2T6gHGdRoK28yFKBEdVbPTc0Xrrwl8ckhdxDo0w+jeoGoQw/4LqgV3T0vXsqIREYkaVBBo8QnTM4/e1UPXN2tVU6SkSXGlTv8xx31yhqTrYlBXaPSwG4x6jwgzdzhq+8dba1DZrQOcmy7+JVmw2ItO5QDIUXrF35Oh/eRC+HkeYeDklsvOI3FhrfiTmSkhPIgD36WdzraUmYXJ9M1jetm5Aygx59ektuvLkemF+d0USnxa/Ls+L9N19Sn/WQ5wtJhV4QvOk/55GTY/I+WOzdGrdkqKdJgsOeHKHQFDDnxEC1QQtEX8KYbn8JUhJ2w==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(2906002)(5660300002)(4326008)(478600001)(52536014)(966005)(110136005)(6636002)(54906003)(186003)(9686003)(26005)(8676002)(86362001)(55016002)(66946007)(6506007)(316002)(53546011)(33656002)(64756008)(66446008)(76116006)(71200400001)(66556008)(8936002)(66476007)(83380400001)(7696005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: sqj2loETNhXpuG52F+Ry9Cs7V2qoVKgp25ZF3pmrNblvKXh8GJdSJAQVJl5VhFWsOhgYTLGYYk6rlZ3qpCNz85j7F+kIt+8jRG6zlcyfNk3hPPri8Q2m6qL5UcnmsXKbIETbH7sMRDx3Y42pNcIbhhRKXEmnZ03N9gpAZlHhvidx/iUsEhFRnO1zTn9ms/galB/GvBus0I7JyxzkKH/Rj7FYpB60GleuyNvAg6juGVGmumkvRt8EIf1hmWinjgdxiNLrtHKnq9adgaWFBOZISA044V4bewJ8rDqiJOPTtn/oAWEOI1FflrrSrewfij+Gsts+cn+nQ58APW1Z6bLFldUxjZTwRUlmIGFIYRveAX3PFW5F/Q7CLHXzXFaxYld7DfSPCv9jJYZJI00W+q5+68+rSNkkc54vPlSy8Jde8Min9EO5++80KZ1JAbDG04+oP0hh42PnC4iLGxgc6JKQBLHyz8hUALHMQ18Pqwz7CEI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 923f913f-23a0-46cb-3cba-08d812b7321e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jun 2020 12:08:50.0993 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: gMhm6e67lbJcA6LDXLzSGPqjSHp4ORgbdVvA8qXAuD/5m5+K2udz5sqiQWWQkcB7YwsLUCtWKwihVOXpjADp4w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4661
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Wv_jzFZOVOvRnL_yubU1LfnRAqM>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:08:57 -0000

Hi Les,

Would you be opposed to adding text similar to the OSPF paragraph below to the ISIS draft?

I think that the OSPF draft does a better job of first introducing UDAs.  Having just looked at the ISIS draft, it does seem to somewhat assume that the reader will just know what they are ...

I understand that this should resolve Scott's concerns.

Regards,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: last-call <last-call-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Scott O. Bradner
> Sent: 15 June 2020 11:17
> To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org; ops-
> dir@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-
> link-attr-reuse-14
> 
> that looks just fine to me - thanks
> 
> Scott
> 
> > On Jun 15, 2020, at 5:14 AM, Peter Psenak
> <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Scott.
> >
> > there is a following text in the OSPF draft:
> >
> >  "On top of advertising the link attributes for standardized
> >   applications, link attributes can be advertised for the purpose of
> >   applications that are not standardized.  We call such an
> >   application a "User Defined Application" or "UDA".  These
> >   applications are not subject to standardization and are outside of
> >   the scope of this specification."
> >
> > Feel free to propose an additional text if you feel above is not
> sufficient.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >
> > On 14/06/2020 21:22, Scott Bradner via Datatracker wrote:
> >> Reviewer: Scott Bradner
> >> Review result: Ready
> >> I have reviewed the latest version of this document and my earlier
> issues have
> >> been resolved at least well enough for teh document to be considered
> ready for
> >> publication.
> >> that said I still do not see where "User Defined Application
> Identifier" is
> >> actually cleanly defined - one can read carefully and determine but it
> would be
> >> easier on the reader to just say that it is a field that can be used to
> >> indicate the use of one or more non-standard applications within some
> scope
> >> (network, subnet, link, organization, ... not sure what scopes are
> meaningful
> >> here but it does not seem that a User Defined Application Identifier
> would be a
> >> global (between network operators) value
> >> Scott
> >
> > --
> > last-call mailing list
> > last-call@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email