Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05

"Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)" <manbhard@cisco.com> Thu, 02 August 2018 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <manbhard@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37929130E17; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ctb42cbnEVcx; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F368130DDD; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10856; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1533245672; x=1534455272; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=w/J8F2MTV23j1/l8Gfzb7inQLsNUGDSQBHVMa/7J4WA=; b=dR3+u9vDRZo4kGPFkb3aVhqw2h0aoYqzzlMxzkNUsOhZhn8JQI7ilbxP dxw9cOXxS5kKXMktZuAD9+nZ3eyms92UB5Jvck71pi0tv+vbymMFpm5h4 dYe1zsMan8Za083571JIb8PSh4FUyE3PeJrJJZEZszintrBe0JN6ayHqx I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DKAQDod2Nb/5NdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJXd2N/KAqDdJRLgg2QQIUaFIFmC4RsAheCbiE2FgECAQECAQECbSiFNgEBAQEDI0sGBRACAQgRAwECKwICAjAdCAIEAQ0FgyABgRtksxaBLopZiQgXgUE/gTkfgkyESwERAgE1CYJhMYIkAohniTKIDQkCj0CBSYQeiC2SIgIRFIEkJAMuYXFwFTsqAYI+CZBKb44egRsBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,436,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="151580930"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2018 21:34:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w72LYVC8025704 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:34:31 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 17:34:30 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-014.cisco.com ([64.101.220.154]) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com ([64.101.220.154]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 17:34:30 -0400
From: "Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)" <manbhard@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
Thread-Index: AQHUKqOmD9zpzbkCAE67h6QZ29hqKaSsyZ4A
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:34:30 +0000
Message-ID: <258C8CDF-387F-4C3C-B243-22C7202F4041@cisco.com>
References: <023A5C03-A5AD-4F8D-B6E2-1518EA4EEB95@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <023A5C03-A5AD-4F8D-B6E2-1518EA4EEB95@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.c.0.180410
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.35.85.78]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_258C8CDF387F4C3CB24322C7202F4041ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.152, xch-rtp-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/_s1YuywVhraEDYSlvVSqj2rcwUI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:34:34 -0000

I am not aware of any IPRs.

-Manish.

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:59 PM
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: <keyur@arrcus.com>, <padma@huawei.com>, <manbhard@cisco.com>, <serpil@cisco.com>
Resent-Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:59 PM

Authors, LSR WG,

This mail is to start the Working Group Last Call IPR poll on the subject document.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are currently no IPR disclosures against ospf-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Acee