Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05

Padmadevi Pillay Esnault <padma@huawei.com> Thu, 02 August 2018 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <padma@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CDF130E01; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYjLsYHCzjx1; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7FA130E17; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DDE66C15ECBEF; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 22:04:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.39) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 22:04:51 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.107]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.139]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:04:42 -0700
From: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault <padma@huawei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
Thread-Index: AQHUKqOmD9zpzbkCAE67h6QZ29hqKaStaOSA
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:04:42 +0000
Message-ID: <0F5C4CF9-3748-4C82-9108-8E720B343308@huawei.com>
References: <023A5C03-A5AD-4F8D-B6E2-1518EA4EEB95@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <023A5C03-A5AD-4F8D-B6E2-1518EA4EEB95@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.246.165]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0F5C4CF937484C8291088E720B343308huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/s5Bw2QNudmPr9H-qI-Zm8XSYq1g>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:04:58 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks
Padma

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:59 PM
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: <keyur@arrcus.com>, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma@huawei.com>, <manbhard@cisco.com>, <serpil@cisco.com>
Resent-Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:59 PM

Authors, LSR WG,

This mail is to start the Working Group Last Call IPR poll on the subject document.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are currently no IPR disclosures against ospf-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Acee