IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Lsr] Status of draft-ietf-isis-encapsulation-cap

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 13 April 2019 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BD8120729 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z2s5fi0OyEgl for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F08CE120724 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 08:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x3DFx79t010391 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:59:07 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC5822042 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:59:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9C7A22048 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:59:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.114.253.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x3DFx5Qi029823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:59:06 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: lsr@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:59:05 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <07ab01d4f211$d28f75d0$77ae6170$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdTyEQJSFHHNDuUuRzqKA87Nmz++eg==
X-Originating-IP: 87.114.253.143
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24550.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.207-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--6.207-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24550.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.207400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: PA+/WlSmJlvvXvInwhwK2wT7nkRG4FChhK6MUk5fDP1wkdIrVt8X1XSC WFE87l1FwI+C5sucb2JUFwdbPogKxQcSBA/LYDihgdzLrgnOedGZf5btvM85AXTcYDPnhOj7cky ePomYDZn8ghu+CDSZ3pIxb34/Z4DWVRSmRHiFYLUtMfCdg6KRDWXdsHc3/fPG0XGri57ZoRhlKC /LwM+XRv/mPno+c3l6kZOl7WKIImq0P2qkGU0XyhUPfLVy1gdhXedzf0x0feEUGm4zriL0oQtuK BGekqUpI/NGWt0UYPC4vYcGI2k28cx08rRgmGobkV9VQFwjmNdzxIfWhCE2cpPEIj+eaC6z
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/bFE1ECpzsNFeIH2MVq-n_VC7Bd8>
Subject: [Lsr] Status of draft-ietf-isis-encapsulation-cap
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 15:59:12 -0000

Hi,

Any clues?

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-encapsulation-cap/ shows
expired in October 2017, so I guess that is good and dead.

On the other hand,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap/ found
its way onto the RFC Editor Queue at around the same date and has languished
there ever since.

Did the ISIS work get replaced by some other draft without the "replaced by"
link being set up?
Was it deemed unnecessary in ISIS?

Thanks,
Adrian (who is trying to get draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip through the IESG and
finds a reference to this draft)
--
Fairy tales from North Wales for adults of all ages
https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/
Available from your favourite online bookseller.
Or contact me to receive a signed copy by mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email