Re: [Lsr] Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: (with COMMENT)

["Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[e-mail]>]

Andrew -

Thanx for the review.

S-bit is dataplane independent because it is applicable to both SR-MPLS and SRv6.

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Alston via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 6:09 AM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-
> positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi There,
> 
> Thanks for the document and for attempts to clarify things.  By way of one
> non-blocking comment, and just for my own understanding, I'd like to
> understand
> why the S-Bit (Segment Routing Policy) has been explicitly denoted dataplane
> independent.
> 
> This comment equally applies to draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andrew
> 
>