IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 05 February 2019 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F90124BAA; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 09:21:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -19.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-ApbhEluaRJ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 09:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EFF4130EA4; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 09:21:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7740; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549387311; x=1550596911; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=+4vZ+S1l2P9+/pVF7vW86AD4K1MMjdMG7LeFCLUmbX4=; b=Lg0gsGF+Ozds+mFC+dZVfKb6ubY+pAwUPaiV1HGYUkuFV4e0DfFANL03 dwIkgLrwP+8kghsP4ciPeP0fNJgnsHIxFaFTgHGovjWrGkBi6vAU+2lwo ZnZWewJtuqudN3uN3cUynczTT9CUfICVKEsAh8a2BYg2VIGPW0Gn/bynh I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AHAADjxFlc/5xdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUgQBAQEBCwGBDXZngQMnCoN5lBCCDYkniHqFb4F7CwEBhGwCF4J7IjUIDQEDAQECAQECbSiFSgEBAQEDI2YCAQgRAwECKwICAh8RHQgCBAESgyIBgR1MAxWsJIEviAwNgh6MQxeBf4ERJx+CHi6CV4JKgmkxgiYCkBWHBoswMwkCjwKDOxmSR4oqhliKZAIRFIEnIQE1KIEucBVlAYJBkF1BMY1bgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,336,1544486400"; d="scan'208,217";a="235499299"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2019 17:21:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x15HLnbZ029873 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:21:50 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:21:49 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:21:49 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV
Thread-Index: AQHUvVESI0EjoYZPO0Gh8Mzt9fngVKXRY2uA
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 17:21:48 +0000
Message-ID: <12BF6AD3-674E-47F5-BD05-040B33DD0354@cisco.com>
References: <DE0E4808-0C9A-415B-9D96-85B75A385B84@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DE0E4808-0C9A-415B-9D96-85B75A385B84@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_12BF6AD3674E47F5BD05040B33DD0354ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.153, xch-rtp-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/gTlDp9mwOCEF6vAhEgnNCXI2FG4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 17:21:54 -0000

Hi Alex,


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 7:48 AM
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV

Hi,

I have question regarding RFC 4203, Section 3. That section introduces top-level TLV type 4 (Link Local TLV) and, at the same time, describes Link Local Identifier TLV. I guess that latter in fact is Sub-TLV of Link Local TLV. Also, IANA Considerations section doesn't mention that Sub-TLV, but only introduction of Link Local TLV. IANA has no corresponding registry  - "Types for Sub-TLVs of Link Local TLV (Value 4)".

I believe this example is actually wrong and section 3 should refer to the top-level Link TLV (value 2) defined in RFC 3630. The Link Local Identifier is the one advertised in Link Local/Remote Identifiers Sub-TLV (type 11) defined in RFC 4203 section 1.1.

Hope this helps,
Acee

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Alexander Okonnikov

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email