[Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV
Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com> Tue, 05 February 2019 12:47 UTC
Return-Path: <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA77130E66; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 04:47:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2IXGe_QMsDY; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 04:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB158130E46; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 04:47:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id g67so3514621wmd.2; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:47:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=XnDKCsbZ1v366hP8lXU0egGzQUBv+LESDGQjX5ked3U=; b=KuVlXbqTQx5ZRmXL1xAnLmXz678vgDKUqFGZKIpjNJzrxEvBZsD6bnln5bESeAyPcY cU6mljBdllgbnSnk8O4z+K86/EfHg0v1kOWBxD64GysaUO1s990ihJgw10jGr4CH8GUV K0tlWnRzxCSf6o8alqqROKjjLEAznYtcdUtmmqMQ3d+ZxLZ6RmvKBlEChoAcLpAbxGR2 9CQyrqFb5lsP5grbWRPqNFDRnlbNS0PbAH4S4lAi1HmuHZctIar5oU6G/gs21pvrAuJ4 fpJJNYBao1KXo7ZogK9/jry0jIBVlYZDtH7hLWaGfGi/Z6U/Ps0JczDeuIWxiE6ER4Dg zbYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=XnDKCsbZ1v366hP8lXU0egGzQUBv+LESDGQjX5ked3U=; b=DaQyVHMpXMLESit249VenUmrrYG8xYjnAyMPzRrj91TsTjqegUDI/sSKreaEfGrOms uu7ulQXKvt2b9gs6UmCymwBe3MBrrKHR6V4zloBexZTfkx+LGCPt2qqy4sMy0zIUdoqd Sbh6jFCHxiNv4G0FfbPC39OchOPEq9EkWCmPljuBsaKrdAc3ehwTKDhg/KWUuwIIMiso QMhx1GukRZMSPwdtJt6Vc3Y3rHWO3tfkPp+mogR0JWZO01+kUCCVu0P2lwdpXL6jCwpU HC9vxKKdfb/MhesVRmw35N27xdhQNpIo/HkECgUKFy6xPOA+AedegY8jS/hEoNAp57qC WBQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubny5vGvpWQ8tcykUmHxrk8lyjavjrkYMAKgL1Zd8Se3ar2rGSC vdqnsanzdB4m6Gj206IBRApk3D40
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IayEbzhCagalyHGLkkfR0YsFKmo7CTgsL1sDSga0GI2/OOxnMvaLqT+LVs8L6BtmrTkaj2f2Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2003:: with SMTP id g3mr3597268wmg.32.1549370868831; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:47:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.161.107.33] ([212.65.85.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t63sm10772820wmt.8.2019.02.05.04.47.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:47:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6EBA4B95-BB06-4760-B654-965206F381D2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Message-Id: <DE0E4808-0C9A-415B-9D96-85B75A385B84@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 15:47:46 +0300
To: ccamp@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ndUQMsh9Tx2aNF4uyXMQvpsdnu0>
Subject: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:47:53 -0000
Hi, I have question regarding RFC 4203, Section 3. That section introduces top-level TLV type 4 (Link Local TLV) and, at the same time, describes Link Local Identifier TLV. I guess that latter in fact is Sub-TLV of Link Local TLV. Also, IANA Considerations section doesn't mention that Sub-TLV, but only introduction of Link Local TLV. IANA has no corresponding registry - "Types for Sub-TLVs of Link Local TLV (Value 4)". Thanks in advance. Best regards, Alexander Okonnikov
- Re: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV Acee Lindem (acee)
- [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV Alexander Okonnikov
- Re: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV Okonnikov Alexander
- Re: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV Alexander Okonnikov
- Re: [Lsr] OSPF TE Link Local TLV Peter Psenak