Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-27: (with COMMENT)
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 30 January 2024 01:52 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25683C18DB80; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:52:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JNhaL97szh8H; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:52:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFE6C17C8B3; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6de287449f1so922492b3a.2; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:52:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706579537; x=1707184337; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rXkq7ph0CnyHU1hs9oa1L956oaWfR925TB3PhGIgoLg=; b=XNj6Ori7m7KLv8Hrfy9FK86gRDrasM1MQvsMf2x73z4YsPMF+WIht/dMzP6BTKksC8 5PvssGuONhbYNDTEwIaDITOmKvMri9LLbTrj2oSQkkUgcuig9FUXtUdKqftsUEto9Yx7 JRUJRlqcDfdnoPpd01VJm8jAcwSZhFnaBdZ5dmR42cTwf425V/e/vrswmuPV7yxoQMAU 94K0+Tk3t7EOQ1aYaJyl60XUvUzWwxr+TRg9smntNwpMSIEL7cVedCMOVePU7TqZ2DPg p1EWBwvhxptaFsOr8U2L98RAqqwzNY5oR/+ICDG5OBBSWL45wZuxSDZgOe8YyJf1Mjpn s+Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706579537; x=1707184337; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rXkq7ph0CnyHU1hs9oa1L956oaWfR925TB3PhGIgoLg=; b=FKyKraSbXpxV5IzM5nbgLaaq9NEbjgqlMQxtIKGHStTW2FAN3jHppSvxyTl+TOyrLW 5hb4PtdTl5yGLpOv58RQm7NZvqJWHiFixzaO7VuAT7KwAEd3AOSiX14+B9CYGAmr6KJ2 sC6ex0k71usRcYD/tGe+CgpYt9iIO1aYrHsUvHoA0PAtUAbMsEXnxFXkaslwKQYusz7F Dp6qXTocmRg3NmN+fVcxZAG40cPf4bSLb3aczqzT5xEQC+4w+zfdOELI7SdMbNaa1h7c JUXwgN+/cwt0uMz4+2lJV4kFuzgK6SbY/oat+wNRaTYbhU02gAwxJ9sH1pxkL0RDmAWS EPkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx4bwXxtuIbTIY0XAjN2ftcRBbY/VVXl0tpjJIzB5gxJq2lscw3 Sux1yT2CcReXZFBYyLJos0gknjSJJU6Uj2UM5oWXYSegk+7iKRZP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEpgBx1Ijwws5QpFpBue1G49QgSy9moLn3DcDaf4OJmKul9OQMOjiJhjUSK3+W0pmXXl5/cPQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:f92:b0:6db:d78f:d675 with SMTP id ct18-20020a056a000f9200b006dbd78fd675mr4301292pfb.14.1706579536880; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([70.234.233.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1-20020a62cf01000000b006d9c65cc854sm6863860pfg.26.2024.01.29.17.52.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:52:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <4DD3388F-4A89-4D5F-ACE0-B3F9BF5B681D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_920D61CE-A547-4429-A52B-9A316581F918"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\))
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:52:15 -0800
In-Reply-To: <7C4AB442-FFD8-44F2-A0E5-A190ABC02812@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang@ietf.org, lsr-chairs <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <170652358887.60201.5322393151775104580@ietfa.amsl.com> <7C4AB442-FFD8-44F2-A0E5-A190ABC02812@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/gyu9BCn1J7w_4knmPiRLzUh9Pio>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-27: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:52:20 -0000
Hi Acee, > On Jan 29, 2024, at 6:33 AM, Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Éric, > > Thanks for the review - see inline. > >> On Jan 29, 2024, at 05:19, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-27: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thanks for the work done in this document. >> >> Like id-nits, I wonder why BCP14 template is used in the main body (in addition >> to its occurence in the YANG module itself) as there are occurence of normative >> language neither in the main body nor in the YANG module. Please consider >> removing the 2 occurence of the BCP 14 template. > > This is normal for YANG model documents. I’d like to hear from OPS ADs on this if it is changing. The point Eric is bringing up is that you are not using any of the key words from BCP 14 like MUST, MUST NOT etc. Why do you need the include the template in that case. Cheers. > > > >> >> Should there be a less trivial example ? > > Operational state examples are not easy to produce without access to implementations. I’ve got it on my list of things to do to look at the available tools but it isn’t going to happen for this document. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > >> >> >> > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ls… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet… Acee Lindem