IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Sun, 03 February 2019 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6475B128CF2 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 13:28:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.642
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.642 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OzgvmmC2x9sU for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 13:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9663126C7E for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 13:28:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2050; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549229327; x=1550438927; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=K9F5wQ/OzrvDHLZ0IrA9LCMoRvnBE3KjowXszEULK8o=; b=ScQqCejDE/JcybOzHG31S5gJLvMJQHgN8yYh916hk3EAe2FTMGcOEy5A Qx0ZbgeMVWx0xTghu6WX9LFXK2i4h4yc6zffVlwvFgmx7JQMy1DQpbvTq ymzst5PHC7ksz8zSBqkudcWxgJg5hmRz516boNyfI9TFyvGv2db4dBOMa g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAABTXFdc/4QNJK1kGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBggNngQMnCoN5iBqLcYINgmFkhWKOaIF7CwEBGAuESQIXgnoiNAkNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFSgEBAQEDAQEhEToLDAQCAQgRBAEBAwImAgICJQsVCAgCBAENBQiDG4FpAxUPqHmBL4ohBYELizYXgUA/hCOCV0cBAYF4gnKCVwKLeJZHMwkCjn6DMiGBbIVBixeKI4ZVimACERSBJx84gVZwFTuCbIlQgU6FP0ExAY5CgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,557,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="512499686"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2019 21:28:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x13LSkFq002818 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 3 Feb 2019 21:28:46 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 15:28:45 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 15:28:45 -0600
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "tony.li@tony.li" <tony.li@tony.li>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, "chopps@chopps.org" <chopps@chopps.org>, David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>, "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
Thread-Index: AQHUu+I7MTaos8rZLUehB4M55Pvgq6XO5twA//+wFVA=
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 21:28:45 +0000
Message-ID: <ef8227f8259140f1bb0286d2c40b447a@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <sa65zu31zqk.fsf@chopps.org> <sa64l9n1yqy.fsf@chopps.org> <CAOj+MMHVzuhfUNB+U_wLZ6M1KSPzJ_UNNAMwO0q5t9N3BoVoyQ@mail.gmail.com> <SG2PR06MB23139237E9A2CB6918C571C2FC6C0@SG2PR06MB2313.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR15MB34394D9C30E039673757ABEDD06C0@MN2PR15MB3439.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B462E0@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAOj+MMEwLFPy_fCLHC7XXCLbaYX=O8wDSpXe4ALUh9L24ZvAGg@mail.gmail.com> <04B9EB6B-AD78-4FFA-A292-9AFC06CDC487@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <04B9EB6B-AD78-4FFA-A292-9AFC06CDC487@tony.li>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.18.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/l19s8ca6XuqElsLhcD5X_nMSiWM>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 21:28:51 -0000

A very strong +1.

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of tony.li@tony.li
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2019 12:14 PM
> To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
> Cc: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>; chopps@chopps.org; David
> Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>; li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com;
> lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
> 
> 
> I think that this discussion would be greatly clarified if we clearly separated
> the discussion between
> 
> a) the algorithm for computing the flooding topology, and
> b) the signaling to indicate how to proceed.
> 
> I think that we are all in agreement that the algorithms can and should be
> separated from the signaling.
> 
> I think that we are all in agreement that each algorithm should be
> independent.
> 
> I’m of the opinion that the centralized signaling is a bit more extensive than
> the signaling for the distributed mode, but that there is also considerable
> overlap and that things would
> be unnecessarily redundant if we were to separate them. I believe that we
> are not in disagreement about the basics for the distributed signaling.
> 
> If you disagree with this, please clearly articulate why you feel the signaling
> should be separated.
> 
> Regards,
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email