Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1109980] Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Mon, 04 June 2018 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540D0130E0F; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 5.489
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLACK=20, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5hUeQWp0dYTO; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073C0130E0D; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6496; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1528153328; x=1529362928; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=fyLH0ootcv/R+/doSffR7GFktK96yW5/2SHlChfZQ6E=; b=F6BO0iHpGjvpBN5T8WlaMeDia3gPxGUIlOI9kih5dSPTGzOwczMufEln ANw6cSyvYgD8Nj57lT5gWcoSie+LqFUDDYLcB3FXjOKNO8UAKQHvLocLL zfMDpTg4vEUWHamx2/p+nEUJSoURrIlyjjBMT8zTUWg3KlwSlcbz5zu+3 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ATAgCowxVb/4oNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNDYn8oCoNulHKBeYgVjDaBeAsjhEkCF4F5ITYWAQIBAQEBAQECbBwBC4UoAQEBAwEjETcOBQcEAgEIEQMBAQEBAgIfBwICAh8RFQgIAgQOBQgXgwWBZwMNCA+mcYIchwkNgSyBYwWBC4c3gVQ/gQ4BgwyBQYEOgg4tD4JaglQCkSeHGywJAotggnmBRIN4h2aKQoQVgiECERMBgSQkBSyBUnAVgn6CSIhIhT5vjHsqgQSBGQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,477,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="187614594"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jun 2018 23:01:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w54N1xtl029676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 23:01:59 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 18:01:58 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 18:01:58 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "iana-prot-param@iana.org" <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>, "chopps@chopps.org" <chopps@chopps.org>, "uma.chunduri@huawei.com" <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [IANA #1109980] Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt
Thread-Index: AQHT7FycV9f+WXyZmkilUVWRnn9gOqQxBxWAgCAhSQD//64sQA==
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 23:01:58 +0000
Message-ID: <824e9f172e0e4d73bc4545b5889ce35b@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1109980@icann.org> <0B952820-E870-4A95-A323-C24D4D393DE9@cisco.com> <6F992B24-F2C5-48EB-AFA0-9E0039E3FAF9@cisco.com> <rt-4.2.9-22380-1528152716-92.1109980-7-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.2.9-22380-1528152716-92.1109980-7-0@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.62.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/mkncxZUeterUmTr7R159BDk0XN0>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1109980] Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 23:02:11 -0000

Sabrina -

Thanx for completing this.

Any reason why the last two codepoints 

> 22	Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB) (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-
> 06-04, expires 2019-06-04)	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> 24	Segment Routing Mapping Server Preference (SRMS Preference)
> (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-04)	[draft-ietf-
> isis-segment-routing-extensions]

expire on a different date from the others?

I hope this won’t matter as we have passed WG Last Call - but just in case...???

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 3:52 PM
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>; draft-ietf-
> isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org; chopps@chopps.org;
> uma.chunduri@huawei.com; Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>
> Subject: [IANA #1109980] Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for
> Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We've updated the expiration date for the following registrations:
> 
> In the TLV Codepoints Registry:
> 
> 149	Segment Identifier / Label Binding (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-
> 29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	n	y
> 	n	n	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> 150	Multi-Topology Segment Identifier / Label Binding (TEMPORARY -
> registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)
> 	n	y	n	n	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> extensions]
> 
> In the Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 25, 141, 222, and 223 registry:
> 
> 31	Adjacency Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29,
> extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	y	y	n
> 	y	y	y	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> 32	LAN Adjacency Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-
> 06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	y	y
> 	n	y	y	y	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> extensions]
> 
> In the Sub-TLVs for TLVs 135, 235, 236, and 237 registry:
> 
> 3	Prefix Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29,
> extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	y	y	y
> 	y	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> In the Sub-TLVs for TLV 242 registry:
> 
> 2	Segment Routing Capability (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29,
> extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	[draft-ietf-isis-
> segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> 19	Segment Routing Algorithm (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29,
> extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	[draft-ietf-isis-
> segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> We've made the following early allocations:
> 
> 22	Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB) (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-
> 06-04, expires 2019-06-04)	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> 24	Segment Routing Mapping Server Preference (SRMS Preference)
> (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-04)	[draft-ietf-
> isis-segment-routing-extensions]
> 
> Please see
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sabrina Tanamal
> Senior IANA Services Specialist
> 
> On Tue May 15 17:12:25 2018, acee@cisco.com wrote:
> > Hi Amanda, et al,
> >
> > I just communicated with Les, one of the designated experts for the
> > IS-IS TLV 242 registry, and the draft requires two additional Sub-TLV
> > allocations:
> >
> > Sub-TLV 22 for Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB) Sub-TLV 24 for
> > Segment Routing Mapping Server (SRMS) Preference
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> >
> > From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM
> > To: IANA <iana@iana.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org"
> > <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org"
> > <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>, Uma Chunduri
> > <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
> > Subject: Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment
> > Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt
> >
> > Hi Amanda, et al IANA, Alvaro,
> >
> > For a variety of reasons, we will not finish the subject draft by the
> > end of June when the IANA allocations expire. It has just completed WG
> > last call but there are many fastidious reviewers are in the path to
> > completion. Please extend the allocations and add any that were not in
> > the original early allocations. For example, we need the SRMS
> > Preference allocated in the TLV 242 registry ASAP since we have early
> > allocations to make in this registry.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> 
>