[Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 02 June 2020 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29873A0921 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8_y0SLx3gGk for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B6E3A0AF6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (unknown [122.2.104.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6FA3322D4F; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:00:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>, iana-prot-param@iana.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, acee@cisco.com
References: <RT-Ticket-1171772@icann.org> <C952BE83-EF9E-437F-836C-D3221FF533DF@cisco.com> <rt-4.4.3-29956-1591060382-1741.1171772-37-0@icann.org> <39E5E5AC-8E29-43F0-86C3-194754A5B7A7@gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <918d12eb-d2c2-7867-5cb7-8913a8e35c7b@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:59:56 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <39E5E5AC-8E29-43F0-86C3-194754A5B7A7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/n2bq2kZCQcDyNTwrgxyS8gtJ-8g>
Subject: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 08:00:33 -0000

Folks,

I have two questions on the early allocation.

RFC 7120 allows early allocation for two types of

    The processes described below assume that the document in question is
    the product of an IETF Working Group (WG).  If this is not the case,
    replace "WG chairs" below with "Shepherding Area Director".

draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy is an individual document, i.e. not a
product of a working group nor shepherded by an AD, and does not seem to
meet the criteria for early allocation.

Also. draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy request that IANA create a new
registry, as far as I understand new registries can't be created through
early allocation. It is hardly necessary.

The code points are requested from "the IS-IS TLV Codepoints registry",
howver the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" is a name space with 14 different
registries. I think the the registry you want to allocated code point
from the "TLV Codepoints registry"

Since the document, at least I read it, well meet the criteria for 
becoming a working document (minor update to the IANA section), I think
that the easy way out is to start the working group adoption poll.

/Loa


On 02/06/2020 12:52, Tony Li wrote:
> 
> Hi Amanda,
> 
>> However, the IANA Considerations section is missing some information. 
>> How would we fill in the IIH, LSP, SNP, and Purge fields for the TLV 
>> Codepoint registrations?
> 
> 
> We’ve addressed this in 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-06..
> 
> Thanks,
> Sarah & Tony
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 

-- 

My mail server from time to time has come under DOS attacks,
we are working to fix it but it may take some time. If you
get denial of service sending to me plz try to use
loa.pi.nu@gmail


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64