[Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 02 June 2020 08:00 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29873A0921 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8_y0SLx3gGk for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B6E3A0AF6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (unknown [122.2.104.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6FA3322D4F; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:00:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>, iana-prot-param@iana.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, acee@cisco.com
References: <RT-Ticket-1171772@icann.org> <C952BE83-EF9E-437F-836C-D3221FF533DF@cisco.com> <rt-4.4.3-29956-1591060382-1741.1171772-37-0@icann.org> <39E5E5AC-8E29-43F0-86C3-194754A5B7A7@gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <918d12eb-d2c2-7867-5cb7-8913a8e35c7b@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:59:56 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <39E5E5AC-8E29-43F0-86C3-194754A5B7A7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/n2bq2kZCQcDyNTwrgxyS8gtJ-8g>
Subject: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 08:00:33 -0000
Folks, I have two questions on the early allocation. RFC 7120 allows early allocation for two types of The processes described below assume that the document in question is the product of an IETF Working Group (WG). If this is not the case, replace "WG chairs" below with "Shepherding Area Director". draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy is an individual document, i.e. not a product of a working group nor shepherded by an AD, and does not seem to meet the criteria for early allocation. Also. draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy request that IANA create a new registry, as far as I understand new registries can't be created through early allocation. It is hardly necessary. The code points are requested from "the IS-IS TLV Codepoints registry", howver the "IS-IS TLV Codepoints" is a name space with 14 different registries. I think the the registry you want to allocated code point from the "TLV Codepoints registry" Since the document, at least I read it, well meet the criteria for becoming a working document (minor update to the IANA section), I think that the easy way out is to start the working group adoption poll. /Loa On 02/06/2020 12:52, Tony Li wrote: > > Hi Amanda, > >> However, the IANA Considerations section is missing some information. >> How would we fill in the IIH, LSP, SNP, and Purge fields for the TLV >> Codepoint registrations? > > > We’ve addressed this in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-06.. > > Thanks, > Sarah & Tony > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > -- My mail server from time to time has come under DOS attacks, we are working to fix it but it may take some time. If you get denial of service sending to me plz try to use loa.pi.nu@gmail Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [Lsr] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy f… Acee Lindem (acee)
- [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request f… Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations reque… Tony Li
- [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: [IAN… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Lsr] Early Allocations request for "Area Pro… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: … Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: … tony.li
- Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: … Loa Andersson
- Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: … Loa Andersson
- Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: … Tony Przygienda
- [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request f… Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: … Loa Andersson
- Re: [Lsr] Question on the early allocation - Re: … tom petch
- Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations reque… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations reque… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)