Re: [Lsr] Extended LSA: was I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-08.txt

[tom petch <[e-mail]>]

From: Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>
Sent: 09 June 2023 16:05

Hi Tom,

I believe Yingzhen and I have fixed all of these nits in the -14 version.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

<tp>
yes, looks good,

Tom Petch

> On Jun 1, 2023, at 6:16 AM, tom petch <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Acee
>
> My comments all relate to the 'latter I-D', that is to the extended LSAs YANG model, the one you really want to publish and not to the admin tags (which you will doubtless want to publish in due course).
>
> Tom Petch.
> _____________________________________
> From: Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>
> Sent: 31 May 2023 19:44
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-08.txt
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On May 31, 2023, at 06:45, tom petch <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> From: Lsr <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Sent: 28 May 2023 20:35
>
> Simply refreshed before expiration and updated a reference. We really need to publish the extended LSAs YANG model as it is a prerequisite for a lot of drafts.
>
> <tp>
> Regarding the latter, I noted back in 2020 that it was a tough read and that has not changed, so I will likely only have the energy to review it once and so will wait for at least WGLC before undertaking such a review.  Meanwhile  I see some editorial glitches but would not appreciate a revised I-D unless and until that WGLC is imminent.
>
> s.1.1 text is out of date
>
> I don’t see a problem in -09.

I updated with with the full list of normative words.


>
>
> /opf:ospfv3/ospf:body:
> here and elsewhere, what is the final colon doing?
>
> I don’t see this anywhere in the draft.

For better or worse, this is the format that “pyang -f tree” provides.


>
>
>
> contact URL is out of date
>
> I’ll update my Email.

This is updated.


>
>
> references to OSPF YANG need updating to the RFC
>
> This is fixed in -09.

Fixed.


>
>
>
> 'Figure .. ' now appears in four places, doubtless a 'good idea' from the tool makers.
>
> There is only “Figure 1”.

I agree this is confusing. I’ve removed all the figure designations.

Thanks,
Acee



>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
> Like I say, not justifying a new I-D just yet IMHO.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On May 28, 2023, at 3:29 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Link State Routing
> (LSR) WG of the IETF.
>
> Title           : Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Prefix Administrative Tags
> Authors         : Acee Lindem
>                   Peter Psenak
>                   Yingzhen Qu
> Filename        : draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-08.txt
> Pages           : 19
> Date            : 2023-05-28
>
> Abstract:
> It is useful for routers in OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 routing domains to be
> able to associate tags with prefixes.  Previously, OSPFv2 and OSPFv3
> were relegated to a single tag and only for AS External and Not-So-
> Stubby-Area (NSSA) prefixes.  With the flexible encodings provided by
> OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement and OSPFv3 Extended LSAs,
> multiple administrative tags may be advertised for all types of
> prefixes.  These administrative tags can be used for many
> applications including route redistribution policy, selective prefix
> prioritization, selective IP Fast-ReRoute (IPFRR) prefix protection,
> and many others.
>
> The ISIS protocol supports a similar mechanism that is described in
> RFC 5130.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-08.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-08
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>