[Lsr] Publication of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-13

[Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tony, Sue, et al, 

I’ve added the shepherd write-up for the document. It is ready for AD review. 

Thanks,
Acee

> On Jun 8, 2023, at 12:53 PM, Tony Li <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Acee,
> 
> These issues have been addressed:
> 
> - The technical sections have been checked against implementations. The implementations have been found to be non-existant. All existing implementations only deal with the P2P case.
> 
> - We’ve added an informative reference. -14 published with the update.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tony
> 
> 
>> On Jun 5, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Acee Lindem <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Sue, 
>> 
>> Thanks for your review of a fairly large specifying complex functionality required prior IGP expertise. 
>> 
>> Authors, 
>> 
>> Please address Sue’s comments. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Acee (as document Shepherd) 
>> 
>>> On Jun 5, 2023, at 13:21, Susan Hares via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Reviewer: Susan Hares
>>> Review result: Ready
>>> 
>>> The document is written in a clear and concise manner.
>>> The authors have done an excellent job of making a difficult subject clear and
>>> readable.
>>> 
>>> Two technical sections should be checked against implementations of IS-IS with
>>> dense flooding (section 6.6.2.1 and section 6.6.2.2.  I am not implementing so
>>> this check is beyond my capabilities.
>>> 
>>> Editorial nit:
>>> section 3, requirement 3, sentence 2.  "Just addressing a complete bipartite
>>> topology such as K5, 8 is insufficient."  An informative reference to K5,8 or a
>>> bipartite topology might be helpful to readers.  This is an optional editorial
>>> comment.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>