IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-13

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Mon, 05 June 2023 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8E5C151060; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 14:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZdRtvDOb5x4; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc35.google.com (mail-oo1-xc35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84773C14CE22; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5555765c6d3so4127827eaf.1; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686001613; x=1688593613; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kpuDw3oppnYrKy4+rZLgZrl96gOB6N77FK+8DpX6PVs=; b=XMeZhrvXCocO0+rQe3cavfYb62l0c7msbhcrjjeU3ci0GdJhAr2a8t0Tkl9AHZfmPR yGWaIHs10hDYqibFWuy1aGoda7kRa9Nw9HTUgMOiK38SZXjKC2Y+Dk6DQVxir2MImLrH fVvmdIBtlO1pEYxsseh+p0IbjtvVd7nOynLEuOSHuvdcOEoJKwbHq82l3fVjpkYOswpN Z0lxPBvyNGT/l9pbVfqvZCGj0j4w5pph9z1854nb3MwFtGgj11CuXisPCcGY6CUg0QsV m+s4tvhnzGbFWOLH6MStJ+d6obzNL0eINApjh7Rvh6mE9cfviXgAXj81bT7TVQwk3fYo SuTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686001613; x=1688593613; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kpuDw3oppnYrKy4+rZLgZrl96gOB6N77FK+8DpX6PVs=; b=c9rUH12+45lBYkr4LzvWvBCAso9jMayP0EZLGTtaJmkSaFMg5Lq7tqTz+zKnjePF1E aGcyVW/Ju/ibDg6sMrUYmlqHTOp82SfpI6MYHtg82kXoAwg73TO5yawuXkfN75rm8llw M4oa+oO2NYSfnbz2oLP7dAfMAzfXTLjtq8raNEFPll0NlJxd8nF9Fff1a2GDKEcb7Zeo LpOWhTE52TfGDuBdPCW987NLut8xkbvRH4ATr2gNXebfDbLX2nKVLRspEXVNNTkrzMp4 RxrB9CZyulaMuLDpYzvg8rC20swrOEVPn3oObpERFl5o9k8u7my4fOPYSRN7KGq8Fcub YqnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyenBtF4adh6PvLaBE34OsFgU1qdFpMbjSyurQTDxGrC2cRg1w5 j1bSySfEmL40bprqP8CkHhY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4giThU4TGryxSJBWlvseFdyd9J7kAH+MDOFRvQqnNicVWwsRRiNuMrP0/AVg3BXFtKPnyyhA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9d94:b0:128:b20f:f965 with SMTP id d20-20020a0563589d9400b00128b20ff965mr320068rwo.18.1686001612969; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 14:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-231-0-74.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.231.0.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5-20020a654545000000b004fab4455748sm5637264pgr.75.2023.06.05.14.46.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Jun 2023 14:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <436B28D2-2D3F-424A-BD43-21EEEB1E6473@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 14:46:41 -0700
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <21846EF9-46FA-4202-95D8-FD6F4B0A7816@tony.li>
References: <168598569343.13872.11493389117456342412@ietfa.amsl.com> <436B28D2-2D3F-424A-BD43-21EEEB1E6473@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>, Sarah Chen <sarahchen@arista.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/adyV-cCKVrAatlCG7gVURs4yWqQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-13
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 21:46:55 -0000

[+ Sarah]

Sarah, could you please review section 6.6.2.1. I no longer have access to an implementation, so it’s all up to you.

AFAIK, there is no implementation of dynamic flooding for OSPF, so I don’t know of a way to check against an implementation.

I would be happy to add a reference for K5,8. I have two references available: one is a textbook, the other is wikipedia.  Preferences?

Tony



> On Jun 5, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sue, 
> 
> Thanks for your review of a fairly large specifying complex functionality required prior IGP expertise. 
> 
> Authors, 
> 
> Please address Sue’s comments. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee (as document Shepherd) 
> 
>> On Jun 5, 2023, at 13:21, Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Reviewer: Susan Hares
>> Review result: Ready
>> 
>> The document is written in a clear and concise manner.
>> The authors have done an excellent job of making a difficult subject clear and
>> readable.
>> 
>> Two technical sections should be checked against implementations of IS-IS with
>> dense flooding (section 6.6.2.1 and section 6.6.2.2.  I am not implementing so
>> this check is beyond my capabilities.
>> 
>> Editorial nit:
>> section 3, requirement 3, sentence 2.  "Just addressing a complete bipartite
>> topology such as K5, 8 is insufficient."  An informative reference to K5,8 or a
>> bipartite topology might be helpful to readers.  This is an optional editorial
>> comment.
>> 
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email