Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-13

[Sarah Chen <[e-mail]>]

The whole section 6.6.2 is about the use of LANs in distributed mode. I am
not aware of any implementation of the distributed dynamic flooding.

Thanks,
Sarah

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 4:46 PM Tony Li <[e-mail]> wrote:

> [+ Sarah]
>
> Sarah, could you please review section 6.6.2.1. I no longer have access to
> an implementation, so it’s all up to you.
>
> AFAIK, there is no implementation of dynamic flooding for OSPF, so I don’t
> know of a way to check against an implementation.
>
> I would be happy to add a reference for K5,8. I have two references
> available: one is a textbook, the other is wikipedia.  Preferences?
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Acee Lindem <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sue,
> >
> > Thanks for your review of a fairly large specifying complex
> functionality required prior IGP expertise.
> >
> > Authors,
> >
> > Please address Sue’s comments.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee (as document Shepherd)
> >
> >> On Jun 5, 2023, at 13:21, Susan Hares via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Reviewer: Susan Hares
> >> Review result: Ready
> >>
> >> The document is written in a clear and concise manner.
> >> The authors have done an excellent job of making a difficult subject
> clear and
> >> readable.
> >>
> >> Two technical sections should be checked against implementations of
> IS-IS with
> >> dense flooding (section 6.6.2.1 and section 6.6.2.2.  I am not
> implementing so
> >> this check is beyond my capabilities.
> >>
> >> Editorial nit:
> >> section 3, requirement 3, sentence 2.  "Just addressing a complete
> bipartite
> >> topology such as K5, 8 is insufficient."  An informative reference to
> K5,8 or a
> >> bipartite topology might be helpful to readers.  This is an optional
> editorial
> >> comment.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>