IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Lsr] RFC 8919, RFC 8920, Flex Algo, and Flex Algo BW Constraints

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 10 August 2021 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852463A1BB6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=h3XyqEt3; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=se5Y0wQs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FNAvcgcGwy9l for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168643A1BB4 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6371; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1628628197; x=1629837797; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=vZhubpK7wlkx542So+Ljcon5sbGzfa0nw2mlz07J51g=; b=h3XyqEt3yxUDtiqyVF7LFRnVVaxP/f5Ra3RmO9jZOzZUQc1z2Rkq2Hht KMehA4oI3m1snshunLaJnDcdfd5wMcVCpnA6QxbhBxEZFn3lDdSNtemO0 Fr/dPiDiDb+MwO5wfT3k6CTrUr4qsG+6XMbwKfgOR8oVS5ENbvjOQxoX1 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:tSkrEB0CvysgPfWrsmDPs1BlVkEcU/3cPwMJ5Nwgkb0dOqig/pG3OkvZ6L0tiVLSRozU5rpCjPaeqKHvX2EMoPPj+HAPeZBBTVkJ3MMRmQFzAcOZBwv8NvG5JyA/Fd5JAVli+XzzOENJGcH4MlvVpHD67TMbFhjlcwRvIeGgEY/JhMPx3Oe3qPXu
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23: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
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DkDAAI5BJh/4wNJK1ahAUwUQd3WjcxhEeDSAOFOZ4ehQGBQoERA1QLAQEBDQEBQQQBAYRxgksCJTgTAQIEAQEBEgEBBQEBAQIBBgSBEROFaAEMhlsRHQEBOBEBSgIEMCcENYJPAYF+VwMvAZ0UAYE6AoofeoExgQGCBwEBBgQEglGCRhiCNAmBOoJ8hA0BAYJohCMcgg2BFSccgjKBcoMLARIBgzg2gi6EPgOBI5ciiEqfVwqDKJ5LBSamb5YPoDSEZwIEAgQFAg4BAQaBdyRpcHAVZQGCPlAZDo42g1qKXnM4AgYBCgEBAwmIeAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,310,1620691200"; d="scan'208,217";a="825946802"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 10 Aug 2021 20:43:15 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 17AKhFTX031243 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:43:15 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.231) by xbe-aln-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:43:15 -0500
Received: from xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) by xfe-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:43:14 -0400
Received: from NAM04-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:43:14 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=iW6b7zFFSWnYKY2slgU+nG42OSbbcKkvNulv7Qs5oXOTRBp+Y5iTDpBE2kCy6+S2TvtAjgHsikkW3jASfv0/P23CD4l8TfJJUkNN+AuMHkh4GZPZFdRJLE/KpddtD8tf+GPAP7/IM9dwdsPOSOuYeMqUqeyPAa/Q0yGx1VkREPSofCPfqr6aszgs9FLq8jfoOoRGXWpSjyKy5NsnQ5BsqZKPsdpIJ+pRBlNVVxdqui4t5bABJfTEUjVz4KNYX80Phl9TjwCVJtdsITM4lb/vfnhYtbqv/2jLGD0rqxKI+hY9Wv/MmXKvnHg605GLU3j9nQW+nviIruyngIlHAumgQA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vZhubpK7wlkx542So+Ljcon5sbGzfa0nw2mlz07J51g=; b=iX0LxDm9zBvVJq4IPYzjnw+rAtu1Ajfi4gMu4ahvT8N8wsGZcgZRbLnXxzKQR0GXWG+JLSfMSIT1v9biTsuXlf72nl5zsOUFGgKPngQ6vhNMBdeRvNQ0kvKBJtSo1ZDqRsifNUXb+X3HJJpmwxApTTpXbbTeu2AuzmcjJW1l+Osh4OQ6yPqKMnc2NaBcDbmx/xg+b80rmuwHQiyI6bjM/ejtbI4EVkrYEuzWgpkS29SUnnGh6cV8QcSz3ygv9r81plKfReGzDuLL/b65buKy/NuRrmQ0CUov3Bi2+MfZ1NybtZ6KXAJ31X0G5On5GH7t7CInR1Abf0ZIKbMjxz+6AA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vZhubpK7wlkx542So+Ljcon5sbGzfa0nw2mlz07J51g=; b=se5Y0wQs4cK9JVfWlPoG717fHILFvxnEkMWhjh+SeiXl6AcwN4+pF5p6+JufArKi1mb4bO7qAl0ulHrHq8CFkMEfMViTBjKDRZsuboI3w0pnwCeEubsX48Fie0bUWMSwrXU1BwHs9/GAKlQBzJKBvndJJmgpudHGt0QN4jxmn/Y=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by BY5PR11MB4054.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:189::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.17; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:43:13 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a19c:e0ca:19d9:19e2]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a19c:e0ca:19d9:19e2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.4394.023; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:43:13 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC 8919, RFC 8920, Flex Algo, and Flex Algo BW Constraints
Thread-Index: AQHXjihWkNsCaGCOW0iNsI6ncAbDBA==
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:43:13 +0000
Message-ID: <71314C50-58BC-423D-A586-54A709788A1D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.51.21071101
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b445a22e-b920-42e4-44c2-08d95c3f7923
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4054:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB4054C758782C95EA8FA04FFDC2F79@BY5PR11MB4054.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(66446008)(66556008)(64756008)(66476007)(6916009)(316002)(71200400001)(6486002)(2906002)(8936002)(66946007)(6512007)(76116006)(91956017)(8676002)(36756003)(86362001)(38070700005)(4743002)(26005)(38100700002)(2616005)(6506007)(478600001)(122000001)(83380400001)(186003)(33656002)(5660300002)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_71314C5058BC423DA58654A709788A1Dciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b445a22e-b920-42e4-44c2-08d95c3f7923
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Aug 2021 20:43:13.3875 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wcWO2Ol+5Hx47766stWTtUZVB+q6eM3oUwZTpWt6Pmop0iI0J7xj/w8Cm6iUwGSw
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4054
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xbe-aln-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/uMqbNV-CFNCv7of_O4-xKEgw7qc>
Subject: [Lsr] RFC 8919, RFC 8920, Flex Algo, and Flex Algo BW Constraints
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:43:22 -0000

Speaking as a WG Member:

  In reviewing RFC 8919 and RFC 8920, it is clear that the ASLA mechanism was to be used for new link attributes and applications. While the documents do not mandate that there never could be a new way to advertise link attributes, this was clearly the intent. Indeed, it would be strange for an RFC to include a mandate that precluded future proposals. The advertisement enablement and deployment sections of these documents specifically cover future attributes and applications.

  Given that we have ASLAs as building blocks, I don’t really see a reason to introduce the generic metric. The proponents say it isn’t an alternative to ASLAs but their examples cite different applications using different metric types (i.e., application-specific metrics). Also, given that ASLA are used by the base Flex Algo draft, it would be inconsistent to diverge for Flex Algo BW constraints.

  Consequently, I would request that draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01 revert to using ASLAs. Based on the LSR Email discussion prior to IETF 111, this was definitely the consensus.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email