IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-19

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 10 March 2023 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C1BC151709; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:14:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P3-0kV_KpVhs; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30A3C1516E0; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:14:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id fr5-20020a17090ae2c500b0023af8a036d2so10082924pjb.5; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:14:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678475640; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=zATjxelNERkV3q4mWH+HWLcquD/zNUfN3k1U9AsJLBY=; b=eDVCgBYb/3Xlg4c+RlCkYnYied4nMY81A4LX+SAX7sXpg9YgOmS1yOqL+JgXGXhJNq 8jId7ebEpDdFAF7EvC1MHn9ynNVmosRs72tHIFqciiFFJhg7rImisWQtOPQCq7AIp/sm DWI8Hz3Ry3cU1U8zqOePtLhr4q/g2JTprAMeRobOmhoKuNHXXiwGVOr9EsGPSzWTgl77 +DUypuuMiJ/2Wz7osL9xcVj+wsneGYY4ZBoqGll/04zgV3EFXECjjfBVMUnsjdDuRScy sDVADGAc/tbdhfZ1hKrr/3VzrQ3M6UuMzmIbqprO+RodaZDqMDVNlPzBtAHLdixjsz2M tbQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678475640; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zATjxelNERkV3q4mWH+HWLcquD/zNUfN3k1U9AsJLBY=; b=m+Hpba3RR3UWm/7uQ9NRB67AIsz9stX/zhWDGjzdmVEHqRrxH2w3VAbbAhEp1ekwTk vol8kJM6JrOHgSiMOimsbv7Sh01IEpGr1pyxAgg7w0UBsF0glwnmqGMzQonYG/+3zwSe v4n64h4+4o+QgXeK4zH47D9h5ak8cR2/vDg+B9KJvlDtJ1iEZvuZ5b3+9KuZv6RmC+2B SkhQlc6ujfge4YJiYTZSG6XifIb/DAtLVlnH/cvloZfauh/PCOE6AvQylyf1CKvzjC0x Rv3fKBqtKCCBeK3G96MVB/i/hj/A0wCYqCruBVC2vmksYJKlxb6MiYSHSr2yez8AQnKk nVzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVDmoPhiANUJEx/9k7egTVrGCAO9yHRPSyj7jIfyLr+0NbIRtis JdWpLmt8cU5nqoDRjWk+TAX01O14AweDZXo/CrI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/I3oig6QPCJzseBKeNcQznqrIYToA4pImAj+oQjkAd8lQDhHmAzOJfgrGQs//MXURVAzbL4J1et6oci2hEw7k=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:420f:b0:234:13d8:ed5b with SMTP id o15-20020a17090a420f00b0023413d8ed5bmr9752040pjg.3.1678475639972; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:13:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:13:58 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswkD0FkcmgsDjp80rcg3k9JyD7v8ZdCcn5r+WtViynHDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMMESsyqvrTH70NXGBpB9DLW6VHvpyY8TSm2m_rovXoxZKPyVQ@mail.gmail.com> <7A7004BC-FD6B-4159-85D0-AEA1FB047788@gmail.com> <CAMMESsyp_7VSwE5geAKagQJ5vaJCTDmQgYwTSFr2Kfwr7Njn=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESswkD0FkcmgsDjp80rcg3k9JyD7v8ZdCcn5r+WtViynHDw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:13:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESszyqfb9aRKd6_ajHRf0bs7GCNLY2J7aXns-G5qTgzR50A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf@ietf.org, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, lsvr-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/N0g06dOfLwAUxJingwVLrSfaDDM>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-19
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:14:03 -0000

Given Ketan’s reply in the other thread, it may be cleaner to request
a new TLV for BGP SPF ASN.

Alvaro.

On March 10, 2023 at 7:02:09 AM, Alvaro Retana wrote:

> 5.2. Extensions to BGP-LS
>
> The format of TLV 512 is defined in rfc7752bis, when used in a
> BGP-LS-SPF NLRI the content MUST be as follows:
>
> Autonomous System: Opaque value (32-bit AS Number). The
> value MUST be set to the AS Number associated with the BGP
> process originating the link-state information.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email